Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/evoscientist/evoskills/paper-graphnpx skills add EvoScientist/EvoSkills --skill paper-graphgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EvoScientist/EvoSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/evoscientist/evoskills/paper-graph)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/evoscientist/evoskills/paper-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/evoscientist/evoskills/paper-graph.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00197 | $0.05968 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00098 | $0.02984 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00597 |
Grade A, and why
paper-graph scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 398 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Paper Graph
Build a Markdown report with embedded Mermaid diagrams showing how research on a user-specified topic (or paper) evolved — clustered into challenges → solutions and traced as per-solution evolution paths.
The skill has no outbound LLM dependency. The host agent provides all LLM calls; the skill provides deterministic data fetchers (S2 / DeepXiv), prompt templates, markdown parsers, and Mermaid renderers. Run the runbook below step-by-step.
When to Use This Skill
Trigger when the user asks something like:
- "Show me the history of " / "How did evolve?"
- "Where does stem from?" / "What did build on?"
- "What are significant improvements / follow-ups to ?"
- "Trace the lineage of ideas in " / "Give me a literature taxonomy of "
- "Citation tree of " / "Idea trace of "
Skip when:
- The user just wants a one-paper summary or single search hit (no relational/evolutionary aspect).
- The request is for non-academic citation work.
- The user explicitly wants a plain bibliography rather than a graph.
Inputs and Output
Inputs:
- A research query: a topic, a seed paper title/citation, or a hybrid. Free-form text.
- Output path (required): path for the final Markdown report. If not given, ask before running.
- (Optional) number of papers to fetch (
--nflag onfetch_papers). Default 10. - (Optional) Mermaid theme
lightordark(--themeon render steps, orMERMAID_THEMEenv). Default light.
Output: a single Markdown file at the user-specified path with these sections:
- Research goal (extracted from the query)
- High-level taxonomy — one Mermaid graph: root → challenges → solutions → paper references
- Per-solution evolution paths — one Mermaid graph per solution, showing paper-to-paper "evolution from" edges, evolution points, open challenges
- Paper appendix — the numbered list of papers with title / year / authors / abstract / conclusion excerpt
What ships with it
16 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/audit_edge.md 1.6 KB
- references/classify.md 1.7 KB
- references/detail.md 4.4 KB
- references/outline.md 2.0 KB
- references/parse_query.md 1.9 KB
- references/seed_paper_block.md 87 B
- requirements.txt 47 B
- scripts/cli.py 48 KB runs code
- scripts/config.py 2.6 KB runs code
- scripts/deepxiv_client.py 4.9 KB runs code
- scripts/logger.py 5.4 KB runs code
- scripts/mermaid.py 29 KB runs code
- scripts/paper_md.py 6.8 KB runs code
- scripts/pipeline.py 23 KB runs code
- scripts/prompts.py 950 B runs code
- scripts/web_api.py 9.0 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 398 lines · 197 tokens per session scan A 5cf506b29f4b
paper-graph is a skill published in the GitHub repository EvoScientist/EvoSkills (431 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 197 tokens to every session and 5,968 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
deltasci
Two-perspective co-reasoning for AI4Science hypothesis generation. Runs a structured 4-round dialogue between a domain scientist (parameterized by a domain pack) and an ML engineer, producing a grounded, falsifiable research hypothesis that is honest about the AI's training-distribution edges. Domain-agnostic via…
skill-creator
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review…
bio-ortholog-inference
Pull pre-computed ortholog calls from public databases (OrthoDB, Ensembl Compara, OMA browser, eggNOG, PANTHER, KEGG Orthology, HomoloGene) via their REST APIs. Use when orthologs are already curated upstream, when the question is "what is the X ortholog of Y" rather than "how to infer orthology de novo", when…
bioprobench
Score an LLM's biological-protocol reasoning on the BioProBench benchmark: protocol QA, step ordering, error detection, protocol generation, and LLM-judged error reasoning; or generate the responses.
arxiv-package
Package a TeX/LaTeX project into a clean tarball or zip for arXiv upload: file selection, build-artifact exclusion, 00README.XXX generation, ancillary file organization, archive validation. Triggers on: "package for arXiv", "create arXiv tarball", "bundle submission", "zip for arXiv", "prepare arXiv upload", "arXiv…