Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add exon-research/genomi --skill gwas-cataloggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/exon-research/genomiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/exon-research/genomi/gwas-catalog)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/exon-research/genomi/gwas-catalog"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/exon-research/genomi/gwas-catalog/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/exon-research/genomi/gwas-catalog"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/exon-research/genomi/gwas-catalog.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.01091 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00545 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
gwas-catalog scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GWAS Catalog Association Evidence
Use GWAS Catalog association records for supplied phenotypes plus candidate variants or genes.
For phenotype plus candidate genes, gwas.compare_gene_associations
returns GWAS Catalog reported_gene, mapped_gene, or source gene-field
association evidence. phenotype.retrieve_trait_gene_records retrieves native
trait-to-gene records from integrated public sources, optionally filtered by
gene. If another source prior is relevant, call that source-specific tool
separately and keep the evidence regimes separate.
HPO or single-subject phenotype matching belongs outside this skill.
Goal
Retrieve and compare GWAS Catalog association evidence with explicit source-field and phenotype-match limitations. Personal interpretation requires separate sample support and careful wording.
Convention: See
skills/conventions/evidence-quality.md.
Cross-Capability Synthesis
A scope-limited result from this capability is not a final user-facing answer when other Genomi capabilities can contribute orthogonal evidence to the same question. Returning "cannot answer" while applicable capabilities remain unexamined is a host-agent failure mode.
Tools
gwas.compare_gene_associations
Compare candidate genes using GWAS Catalog reported_gene and mapped_gene trait-association evidence.
Use when: The user gives a phenotype or trait plus candidate genes and asks for GWAS Catalog gene-field association support.
Why necessary: GWAS Catalog gene fields are source annotations for population-trait associations; they should stay separate from causal-gene, HPO, or drug-target evidence.
Not for: causal-gene claims unless separate causal evidence is supplied.
Result semantics: Returns source-local GWAS Catalog gene-field association evidence only. reported_gene and mapped_gene are source annotations and are not causal-gene evidence. Causal-gene or effector-gene wording returns wrong_evidence_regime with a routing hint.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 115 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A c814325fb904
gwas-catalog is a skill published in the GitHub repository exon-research/genomi (482 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,091 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
release-doi
A release procedure for research repositories that publish versions with a DOI, a permanent identifier for scholarly work, through Zenodo.
autoresearch
Canonical around-the-clock research loop. Defines the agent's outer loop — read taste corpus + queue, pick the next experiment, mutate the explicitly-declared mutation surface, run the experiment under a hard time budget against a frozen metric, score, codify, repeat. Augmented with Karpathy's sharp primitives (frozen…
experiment
Run a materials-science / ML compute job on Rockie GPU capacity. Trigger words "run experiment", "submit job", "/experiment", or requests to quote/approve GPU spend before an experiment. Picks the right GPU type and count from a natural-language description (DFT for QE/VASP/ABINIT, MD for GROMACS/LAMMPS/OpenMM…
physics
Route physics simulation, modeling, validation, and research-compute requests across force fields, molecular dynamics, electronic structure, particle transport/collision, continuum multiphysics, plasma/PIC, nuclear/radiation, and astro/cosmology. Use open-source-first engines, refuse local heavyweight execution on the…
sota-delta
Track 3 quickstart wrapper that reproduces a paper or repository baseline on Rockie GPU, then extends it with a user-specified delta and compares baseline versus delta.
post-run-review
After an experiment finishes, structured review emits {isbug, failureclass, summary, metric, lowerisbetter}, auto-closes the journal node, emits a [LEARN] block when isbug=true, and files a [DEAD-END] when the failureclass is "bad-hypothesis". Use immediately after any training/eval run — the agent invokes this…