Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ForgeyClap/claude-forge --skill writing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ForgeyClap/claude-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/writing-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/writing-plans/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/writing-plans.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.02194 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00878 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00439 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00219 |
Grade A, and why
writing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing Plans
Overview
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: If working in an isolated worktree, it should have been created via the using-git-worktrees skill at execution time.
Save plans to: docs/superpowers/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md
- (User preferences for plan location override this default)
Scope Check
If the spec covers multiple independent subsystems, it should have been broken into sub-project specs during brainstorming. If it wasn't, suggest breaking this into separate plans — one per subsystem. Each plan should produce working, testable software on its own.
File Structure
Before defining tasks, map out which files will be created or modified and what each one is responsible for. This is where decomposition decisions get locked in.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago First seen · 203 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 5b2fb448b136
writing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository ForgeyClap/claude-forge (2 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 2,194 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-25.
Other skills, from other repositories
returns-policy
Answer return, refund, and warranty questions for electronics. Use when the user mentions returns, refunds, RMAs, warranty coverage, damaged items, or opened packaging.
technical-troubleshooting
Provide setup, troubleshooting, and maintenance guidance. Use when the user reports a device that won't power on, connectivity issues, setup questions, overheating, or maintenance concerns.
contribute-spec-fix
Fix a broken OpenAPI spec in jentic-public-apis with an OpenAPI Overlay, validate it (spectral lint + idempotency check), and contribute it back via a PR to the community catalog. Falls back to applying the same overlay to the local Jentic registry if the user can't wait for maintainer approval, and closes the loop by…
jentic
Calls third-party APIs through a Jentic One instance — governed, credential-managed access where the agent searches for an operation, inspects it, and executes it through an audited broker that holds the credentials (identity → discover → check access → execute). Applies when the user asks to call an external API or…
review
Use when operating as the Fabrik Review stage agent. This skill guides code review of an implementation, finding and fixing issues, and ensuring the PR is ready for human review.
implement-comment
Use when operating as the Fabrik Implement comment reviewer. This skill guides applying user-requested code changes during implementation, committing and pushing, and updating the task checklist — without signaling stage completion.