Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GarethManning/education-agent-skills --skill assessment-validity-checkergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GarethManning/education-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/assessment-validity-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/assessment-validity-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/assessment-validity-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/assessment-validity-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/assessment-validity-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.03894 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01947 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00779 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00389 |
Grade A, and why
assessment-validity-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 249 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 7cd36cbcd1f5
assessment-validity-checker is a skill published in the GitHub repository GarethManning/education-agent-skills (759 stars, last pushed 14d ago), with no licence file. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 3,894 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Verification & Quality Assurance
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
continuous-learning
Pattern extraction, confidence-scored evaluation, skill creation, organization, versioning, and cross-project export pipeline.
ai-learning-for-leaders
Guides non-technical leaders through building AI savviness without becoming AI experts, closing the gap between AI understanding and AI deployment. Applies the 'just savvy enough' principle and lifelong AI learning framework. Use when a leader feels inadequate about AI knowledge, defers too heavily to technologists…
goga-discover
Interview the user relentlessly about a decision until every branch of the design tree is resolved, then record the result as a short ADR.
writing-prose
Defines strict and STE-flavored prose rules.
explain-pr
Walk a user through a GitHub pull request to help them understand what it does, using markdown visualisations and a guided diff-by-diff tour. Use when the user wants to understand, explore, learn from, or be walked through a PR (not when they want a formal review).