panel-review

panel-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from GarethManning/education-agent-skills. It costs 39 tokens per session (7,721 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A structured review in which seven separate roles assess teaching framework materials, such as learning criteria and curriculum plans. It combines their scores using minimum quality thresholds.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review curriculum frameworks, criteria banks, definitions, crosswalks, and topic sequences.
Why use it?
It helps identify weaknesses in framework documents and applies a consistent decision rule before approval.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter, but also agents/openai.yaml present.

Part of the education-agent-skills plugin — 165 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to review curriculum frameworks, criteria banks, definitions, crosswalks, and topic sequences.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/panel-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add GarethManning/education-agent-skills --skill panel-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GarethManning/education-agent-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install education-agent-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 165 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for panel-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/panel-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/panel-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/panel-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/panel-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for panel-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/panel-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/panel-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 39 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 7,721 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00039 $0.07721
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.03088
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.01544
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00772

Measured 7d ago against content hash cbd87bf743f9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

panel-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/professional-learning/panel-review/SKILL.md · 486 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago Changed · -139 lines · -10 tokens per session cbd87bf743f9
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 625 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 2eb97761fb08

Subscribe to this mod's changes

panel-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository GarethManning/education-agent-skills (928 stars, last pushed 7d ago), with no licence file. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 7,721 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

review-animations

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

classroomio/classroomio · 34 tokens

ship-feature

End-to-end feature delivery — implement a feature, verify builds/tests pass, open a fully-filled draft PR, then automatically push every feedback round and review iteration to the same PR. Use when the user asks to implement or build a feature, fix-and-ship a change, or iterate on an existing feature PR.

classroomio/classroomio · 66 tokens

edtech-expert

Expert in education technology, adaptive learning, student analytics, virtual classrooms, assessment tools, and learning management systems. Use when the user mentions education, e learning, lms, adaptive learning, student analytics, or virtual classroom, or when the task involves Learning Management Systems, Virtual…

personamanagmentlayer/pcl · 72 tokens

grasp

Build a walkthrough the user works through until they can pass a quiz on it. Use when the user needs to understand something deeply and be quizzed on it.

saadshahd/moo.md · 36 tokens

pocket-education

Pocket Education — mentor mode where the human writes the code and the agent teaches, reviews, and guides with progressive hints, at a depth set by a persistent, skill-specific learner profile. Use when a repo has Pocket Education enabled, when someone wants to learn by doing a real task in this repository, or when…

rfxlamia/pocketto · 127 tokens

explain-pr

Walk a user through a GitHub pull request to help them understand what it does, using markdown visualisations and a guided diff-by-diff tour. Use when the user wants to understand, explore, learn from, or be walked through a PR (not when they want a formal review).

kimgoetzke/coding-agent-configs · 62 tokens