Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GarethManning/education-agent-skills --skill source-credibility-evaluation-protocolgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GarethManning/education-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/source-credibility-evaluation-protocol)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/source-credibility-evaluation-protocol"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/source-credibility-evaluation-protocol/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/source-credibility-evaluation-protocol"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/garethmanning/education-agent-skills/source-credibility-evaluation-protocol.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.04662 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.02331 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00932 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00466 |
Grade A, and why
source-credibility-evaluation-protocol scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 299 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A cdf5a4d859aa
source-credibility-evaluation-protocol is a skill published in the GitHub repository GarethManning/education-agent-skills (764 stars, last pushed 14d ago), with no licence file. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 4,662 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
cognitive-biases
Recognition and mitigation of systematic reasoning errors documented in the heuristics and biases tradition. Covers confirmation bias, availability, anchoring, representativeness, framing effects, hindsight bias, overconfidence, and motivated reasoning. Each bias is presented with its mechanism, diagnostic signal, and…
argument-evaluation
Systematic evaluation of arguments for structure, validity, soundness, and charitable interpretation. Covers premise identification, conclusion extraction, argument mapping, steel-manning, and the distinction between validity (form) and soundness (form plus true premises). Use when assessing an argument…
logical-reasoning
Deductive and inductive reasoning, formal and informal logical structure, validity, soundness, and rules of inference. Covers propositional logic, quantified reasoning, syllogisms, common inference patterns (modus ponens, modus tollens, hypothetical syllogism, disjunctive syllogism), and the distinction between…
algorithmic-awareness
Understanding how algorithmic systems shape what users see, know, and do -- from recommendation feeds to search ranking to credit scoring to hiring software. Covers the mechanics of recommendation systems, algorithmic bias and its sources, personalization's effects on information diets, opacity and accountability, AI…
computational-literacy
Understanding how digital systems actually work -- hardware, operating systems, networks, and information representation -- at a depth sufficient to reason about them rather than just use them. Covers CPU/RAM/storage/GPU roles, what an OS does, how packets travel the internet, and how computers represent numbers…
digital-citizenship
Being a constructive participant in networked communities. Covers digital footprint management, online etiquette and professional communication, collaborative tools, attribution and copyright, cyberbullying recognition and response, and the responsibilities that come with amplification. Use when helping learners think…