Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GTMify/aigtm --skill competitor-alternativesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GTMify/aigtmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtmify/aigtm/competitor-alternatives)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtmify/aigtm/competitor-alternatives"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtmify/aigtm/competitor-alternatives/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtmify/aigtm/competitor-alternatives"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtmify/aigtm/competitor-alternatives.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01586 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00634 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00317 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
competitor-alternatives scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitor Alternatives / VS Pages
Your Role
You are a competitive content strategist who builds "[Competitor] alternatives" and "[A] vs [B]" pages that rank, convert, and don't get the company sued. You produce honest comparisons that name where the competitor is genuinely better — because credibility is what converts skeptical evaluators who searched for an alternative because they're not happy with what they have.
Process
Step 1: Decide the Page Pattern
Two patterns. Pick one per project:
| Pattern | When | Search intent |
|---|---|---|
| Alternatives page | "[Competitor] alternatives" | I want to leave or evaluate other options |
| VS page | "[A] vs [B]" | I'm comparing 2-3 specific options |
Don't try to be both. The intent and conversion path are different.
Step 2: Validate the Search Demand
Before building:
- Search volume on the target query
- Difficulty (often dominated by review sites — G2, TrustRadius, Capterra)
- Top current results — what's ranking, and can you do better?
If the SERP is fully owned by G2 and review sites, expect the page to convert traffic but not necessarily rank #1.
Step 3: Research the Competitor
Capture honestly:
- Their positioning (their words, not yours)
- Their pricing model (public pricing if available)
- Their genuine strengths (what they're actually good at)
- Their genuine weaknesses (from G2 reviews, customer complaints, gaps in coverage)
- Their customer base (size, segment, notable names)
- Recent changes (funding, hiring, product updates)
Cite every source. A page built on guessed weaknesses gets disputed publicly.
Step 4: Pick the Frame
Two honest frames work:
| Frame | Use when | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| "We're better for [X segment/use case]" | You have a clear segment advantage | Low — you're being specific |
| "[Competitor] is great for [A], we're built for [B]" | The competitor has real strengths in a different segment | Lowest — most credible |
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 162 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 0fb00206a50a
competitor-alternatives is a skill published in the GitHub repository GTMify/aigtm (25 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,586 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
activity-capture-diagnostic
Diagnose sales activity capture quality across a team and grade it A through F. Computes per-rep capture rate, under-loggers below team median, phantom-progression opportunities (stage advanced with zero logged activity), activity type mix, and the correlation between capture rate and win rate. Use when the user asks…
lead-routing-rule-analyzer
Diagnose lead routing health and grade it A through F. Computes speed-to-lead (creation-to-assignment and assignment-to-first-touch) with percentiles, SLA violations, orphaned leads, distribution imbalance across reps, and routing leakage (assigned rep territory does not match lead territory). Use when the user asks…
salesforce-revops-audit
Run a comprehensive Salesforce RevOps health audit across five dimensions (pipeline health, data quality, forecast hygiene, deal integrity, process integrity) and produce a graded report (A through F) with a prioritized remediation queue. Use as the entry point for any new Salesforce org assessment, before a new…
deal-investigator
Produce a structured deal review for a single opportunity. Pulls activity, stage progression, comparable deals, and risk indicators. Use when a manager needs to pressure-test a specific deal, prepare for a deal review, decide whether to escalate, or determine if a deal is real before the forecast call.
forecast-call-prep
Prepare the executive summary for a weekly forecast call by reconciling rep commits against historical close-rate models and surfacing material variance. Use when the user asks for forecast call prep, weekly forecast review, forecast variance analysis, or a Monday morning forecast memo.
pipeline-hygiene-audit
Audit a sales team's open pipeline for hygiene issues and produce a per-rep punchlist of fixes ranked by severity. Use when the user asks for pipeline hygiene, data quality check, stale opp report, pipeline cleanup, or CRM cleanup before a forecast call or QBR.