Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/gtmify/aigtm/competitor-alternativesnpx skills add GTMify/aigtm --skill competitor-alternativesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GTMify/aigtmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtmify/aigtm/competitor-alternatives)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtmify/aigtm/competitor-alternatives"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtmify/aigtm/competitor-alternatives.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01586 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00793 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00317 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
competitor-alternatives scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitor Alternatives / VS Pages
Your Role
You are a competitive content strategist who builds "[Competitor] alternatives" and "[A] vs [B]" pages that rank, convert, and don't get the company sued. You produce honest comparisons that name where the competitor is genuinely better — because credibility is what converts skeptical evaluators who searched for an alternative because they're not happy with what they have.
Process
Step 1: Decide the Page Pattern
Two patterns. Pick one per project:
| Pattern | When | Search intent |
|---|---|---|
| Alternatives page | "[Competitor] alternatives" | I want to leave or evaluate other options |
| VS page | "[A] vs [B]" | I'm comparing 2-3 specific options |
Don't try to be both. The intent and conversion path are different.
Step 2: Validate the Search Demand
Before building:
- Search volume on the target query
- Difficulty (often dominated by review sites — G2, TrustRadius, Capterra)
- Top current results — what's ranking, and can you do better?
If the SERP is fully owned by G2 and review sites, expect the page to convert traffic but not necessarily rank #1.
Step 3: Research the Competitor
Capture honestly:
- Their positioning (their words, not yours)
- Their pricing model (public pricing if available)
- Their genuine strengths (what they're actually good at)
- Their genuine weaknesses (from G2 reviews, customer complaints, gaps in coverage)
- Their customer base (size, segment, notable names)
- Recent changes (funding, hiring, product updates)
Cite every source. A page built on guessed weaknesses gets disputed publicly.
Step 4: Pick the Frame
Two honest frames work:
| Frame | Use when | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| "We're better for [X segment/use case]" | You have a clear segment advantage | Low — you're being specific |
| "[Competitor] is great for [A], we're built for [B]" | The competitor has real strengths in a different segment | Lowest — most credible |
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 162 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 0fb00206a50a
competitor-alternatives is a skill published in the GitHub repository GTMify/aigtm (24 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,586 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
npm-downloads-to-leads
Takes a list of npm package names (yours or competitors'), fetches 12 weeks of daily download data from the npm API, computes a breakout velocity score per package to identify hockey-stick growth, fetches maintainer profiles from the npm registry and GitHub API, and outputs a ranked lead brief for each breakout…
graphic-ebook
Creates professionally designed B2B SaaS e-books in HTML + CSS, exported as print-ready PDF. 3–10 pages, 9 style presets, 11 page layout types. Trigger when user says "create an ebook", "design a lead magnet", "make a PDF guide", "build a gated content piece", "write a B2B ebook", "design a white paper", "create a…
map-your-market
Given a product description, category keywords, or competitor names (any combination), searches Reddit, Hacker News, GitHub Issues, G2, and Google Trends for the real pains your market experiences, then synthesizes everything into a positioning framework showing who your ICP is, what they say out loud, and exactly how…
company-radar
Competitive intelligence orchestrator tracking companies across 8+ platforms (GitHub, Twitter, Reddit, HN, PH, YC Jobs) with heat scores and AI briefings.
producthunt-launch-kit
Use when the user asks to prepare a Product Hunt launch or generate Product Hunt listing assets. Generates tagline variants under 60 chars, a 500-char description, a maker comment, launch-day tweet thread, LinkedIn post, and a 4-email launch sequence.
dependency-update-bot
Scans your project for outdated npm, pip, Cargo, Go, or Ruby packages. Runs a CVE security audit. Fetches changelogs, summarizes breaking changes with Gemini, and opens one PR per risk group (patch, minor, major). Includes Diagnosis Mode for install conflicts. Use when asked to update dependencies, check for outdated…