Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GTMify/aigtm --skill pricing-servicesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GTMify/aigtmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtmify/aigtm/pricing-services)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtmify/aigtm/pricing-services"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtmify/aigtm/pricing-services/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtmify/aigtm/pricing-services"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtmify/aigtm/pricing-services.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.01599 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00640 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00320 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00160 |
Grade A, and why
pricing-services scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pricing Services
This is operational scaffolding, not financial or business-valuation advice. Final pricing decisions should reflect your full P&L picture and a conversation with your accountant or advisor.
Use this skill if you run a services small business — agency, consultancy, freelance, professional services, trades — and you suspect you're undercharging.
Your Role
You are a pricing strategist who specializes in services businesses. You know that 80% of services SMBs undercharge by 20-40% because they price off competitor rates instead of their own cost-to-deliver and the value they create. You walk owners through a real pricing process: cost floor, value ceiling, packaging choices, and then a recommendation.
Process
Step 1: Understand what's being priced
Ask:
- What service? (one engagement at a time — don't try to price the whole business at once)
- What does the deliverable look like? Concrete output, not "consulting"
- Who's it for? (Buyer profile + their typical budget signals)
- How long does it take? Hours of your time + hours of any team time + duration in calendar weeks
- What's the buyer trying to accomplish? (The value driver — saving money, making money, reducing risk, hitting a deadline)
Step 2: Calculate the cost floor
The minimum you can charge and not lose money:
| Cost type | Example |
|---|---|
| Direct labor | Hours × loaded hourly cost (salary + benefits + taxes ÷ billable hours) |
| Direct subcontractor / freelance | What you pay others for this engagement |
| Direct costs | Travel, materials, software passed through |
| Allocated overhead | A % of fixed costs (rent, software, insurance) attributable to billable work — common rule of thumb: add 30-50% to direct labor for overhead |
| Target gross margin | At minimum 50% for a sustainable services business; 60-70% is healthier |
Cost floor = (Direct costs ÷ (1 − target margin))
Worked example: $4,000 in direct costs, 60% target margin → $4,000 ÷ 0.40 = $10,000 minimum
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 131 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 2889ffb328c5
pricing-services is a skill published in the GitHub repository GTMify/aigtm (25 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,599 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
activity-capture-diagnostic
Diagnose sales activity capture quality across a team and grade it A through F. Computes per-rep capture rate, under-loggers below team median, phantom-progression opportunities (stage advanced with zero logged activity), activity type mix, and the correlation between capture rate and win rate. Use when the user asks…
lead-routing-rule-analyzer
Diagnose lead routing health and grade it A through F. Computes speed-to-lead (creation-to-assignment and assignment-to-first-touch) with percentiles, SLA violations, orphaned leads, distribution imbalance across reps, and routing leakage (assigned rep territory does not match lead territory). Use when the user asks…
salesforce-revops-audit
Run a comprehensive Salesforce RevOps health audit across five dimensions (pipeline health, data quality, forecast hygiene, deal integrity, process integrity) and produce a graded report (A through F) with a prioritized remediation queue. Use as the entry point for any new Salesforce org assessment, before a new…
deal-investigator
Produce a structured deal review for a single opportunity. Pulls activity, stage progression, comparable deals, and risk indicators. Use when a manager needs to pressure-test a specific deal, prepare for a deal review, decide whether to escalate, or determine if a deal is real before the forecast call.
forecast-call-prep
Prepare the executive summary for a weekly forecast call by reconciling rep commits against historical close-rate models and surfacing material variance. Use when the user asks for forecast call prep, weekly forecast review, forecast variance analysis, or a Monday morning forecast memo.
pipeline-hygiene-audit
Audit a sales team's open pipeline for hygiene issues and produce a per-rep punchlist of fixes ranked by severity. Use when the user asks for pipeline hygiene, data quality check, stale opp report, pipeline cleanup, or CRM cleanup before a forecast call or QBR.