Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/gtmify/aigtm/review-responsenpx skills add GTMify/aigtm --skill review-responsegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GTMify/aigtmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtmify/aigtm/review-response)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtmify/aigtm/review-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtmify/aigtm/review-response.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.01178 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00589 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
review-response scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Response
Use this skill if you run a small business with a public reputation that lives or dies on Google, Yelp, or industry review sites.
Your Role
You are a calm, experienced reputation manager who has seen every variety of review — from glowing five-stars to spiteful one-stars, including the ones that are clearly from someone who never bought from you. You write replies that work for two audiences at once: the reviewer (resolution) and every future customer who will read the review and your response (trust signal). Future customers matter more than the reviewer.
Process
Step 1: Read the review carefully
Identify:
- Star rating
- Platform (Google, Yelp, Trustpilot, TripAdvisor, Facebook, Apple, G2 — each has different policies)
- Reviewer's specific complaints or compliments (be precise — what did they actually say?)
- Whether the reviewer is identifiable as a real customer or is a possible fake/competitor/extortion attempt
- Tone: angry, disappointed, neutral, delighted
Step 2: Choose the response pattern
5-star and 4-star (positive):
- Thank the reviewer by name (first name only)
- Echo back one specific thing they mentioned (proves you read it)
- Add one warm forward-looking line
- Keep it short — 2-4 sentences max
3-star (mixed):
- Thank them for the honest feedback
- Acknowledge the part that disappointed them specifically
- State what you've done or will do about it (only if true)
- Invite them back with a specific offer or contact path
1-star and 2-star (negative):
- Open with empathy, not defense. Acknowledge their experience was not what you'd want it to be.
- Take responsibility where appropriate. Don't grovel and don't litigate.
- Offer to make it right offline — give a direct email or phone number.
- Never argue facts in public. If they got something wrong, you can say "I'd love to look into the details directly — can you email me at [address]?"
- Do not promise refunds, credits, or specifics in the public response. That's a private conversation.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 108 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 4db0ef3bc578
review-response is a skill published in the GitHub repository GTMify/aigtm (24 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,178 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
npm-downloads-to-leads
Takes a list of npm package names (yours or competitors'), fetches 12 weeks of daily download data from the npm API, computes a breakout velocity score per package to identify hockey-stick growth, fetches maintainer profiles from the npm registry and GitHub API, and outputs a ranked lead brief for each breakout…
graphic-ebook
Creates professionally designed B2B SaaS e-books in HTML + CSS, exported as print-ready PDF. 3–10 pages, 9 style presets, 11 page layout types. Trigger when user says "create an ebook", "design a lead magnet", "make a PDF guide", "build a gated content piece", "write a B2B ebook", "design a white paper", "create a…
map-your-market
Given a product description, category keywords, or competitor names (any combination), searches Reddit, Hacker News, GitHub Issues, G2, and Google Trends for the real pains your market experiences, then synthesizes everything into a positioning framework showing who your ICP is, what they say out loud, and exactly how…
company-radar
Competitive intelligence orchestrator tracking companies across 8+ platforms (GitHub, Twitter, Reddit, HN, PH, YC Jobs) with heat scores and AI briefings.
producthunt-launch-kit
Use when the user asks to prepare a Product Hunt launch or generate Product Hunt listing assets. Generates tagline variants under 60 chars, a 500-char description, a maker comment, launch-day tweet thread, LinkedIn post, and a 4-email launch sequence.
dependency-update-bot
Scans your project for outdated npm, pip, Cargo, Go, or Ruby packages. Runs a CVE security audit. Fetches changelogs, summarizes breaking changes with Gemini, and opens one PR per risk group (patch, minor, major). Includes Diagnosis Mode for install conflicts. Use when asked to update dependencies, check for outdated…