Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hermeticormus/claude-code-game-development/git-advanced-workflowsnpx skills add HermeticOrmus/claude-code-game-development --skill git-advanced-workflowsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/claude-code-game-developmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/claude-code-game-development/git-advanced-workflows)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/claude-code-game-development/git-advanced-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hermeticormus/claude-code-game-development/git-advanced-workflows.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00054 | $0.02287 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.01144 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00457 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00229 |
Grade A, and why
git-advanced-workflows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to git-advanced-workflows — 212 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 401 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Advanced Workflows
Master advanced Git techniques to maintain clean history, collaborate effectively, and recover from any situation with confidence.
When to Use This Skill
- Cleaning up commit history before merging
- Applying specific commits across branches
- Finding commits that introduced bugs
- Working on multiple features simultaneously
- Recovering from Git mistakes or lost commits
- Managing complex branch workflows
- Preparing clean PRs for review
- Synchronizing diverged branches
Core Concepts
1. Interactive Rebase
Interactive rebase is the Swiss Army knife of Git history editing.
Common Operations:
pick: Keep commit as-isreword: Change commit messageedit: Amend commit contentsquash: Combine with previous commitfixup: Like squash but discard messagedrop: Remove commit entirely
Basic Usage:
# Rebase last 5 commits
git rebase -i HEAD~5
# Rebase all commits on current branch
git rebase -i $(git merge-base HEAD main)
# Rebase onto specific commit
git rebase -i abc123
2. Cherry-Picking
Apply specific commits from one branch to another without merging entire branches.
# Cherry-pick single commit
git cherry-pick abc123
# Cherry-pick range of commits (exclusive start)
git cherry-pick abc123..def456
# Cherry-pick without committing (stage changes only)
git cherry-pick -n abc123
# Cherry-pick and edit commit message
git cherry-pick -e abc123
3. Git Bisect
Binary search through commit history to find the commit that introduced a bug.
# Start bisect
git bisect start
# Mark current commit as bad
git bisect bad
# Mark known good commit
git bisect good v1.0.0
# Git will checkout middle commit - test it
# Then mark as good or bad
git bisect good # or: git bisect bad
# Continue until bug found
# When done
git bisect reset
Automated Bisect:
# Use script to test automatically
git bisect start HEAD v1.0.0
git bisect run ./test.sh
# test.sh should exit 0 for good, 1-127 (except 125) for bad
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 401 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 624ae93393cc
git-advanced-workflows is a skill published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/claude-code-game-development (60 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 2,287 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to git-advanced-workflows, differing in 212 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
wrap
Session end - document updates, commit.
pre-commit-audit
Deliver a fast pre-commit safety scan: file size, anonymity (author / affiliation strings in tex/bib), hardcoded secrets, and invisible-Unicode carriers. Use when the user requests a fast pre-commit safety scan: file size, anonymity (author / affiliation strings in tex/bib), hardcoded secrets, and invisible-Unicode…
latex-diff
Compare two LaTeX files, project directories, or Git revisions and produce human-readable plus machine-readable severity-graded semantic changes. Use when determining what changed between manuscript versions or preparing a revision audit bundle. Not for proofreading one version; use $proofread.
chezmoi-workflows
Dotfile backup and sync with chezmoi. TRIGGERS - chezmoi, dotfiles, sync dotfiles, backup configs, cross-machine sync.
campaign-commit
Choose the correct commit command in a camp, also called a campaign. Use when you are about to commit and need to select camp commit, camp p commit, fest commit, or intentional root pointer sync via camp refs-sync.
pr-adjudicated-apply
人間の裁定結果(adjudications.json)に基づき、pr-independent-reviewが出力したfindings.jsonのうち reject以外の裁定(案キーA〜F・other)が付いた指摘だけをPRブランチへ実装・検証・pushする無人実行スキル。PR番号を受け取り、 apply専用worktreeでPRのheadをdetached checkoutして修正し、コンパイル・関連テストで検証してからpushする。 checkout後は修正前にsubagentを無条件発火してmasterとのコンフリクトを検査し、あれば逆マージで事前解消する。…