Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to heyderekj/revisemy. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/heyderekj/revisemy/main/.agents/skills/review-animations/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/heyderekj/revisemyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/heyderekj/revisemy/review-animations)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heyderekj/revisemy/review-animations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heyderekj/revisemy/review-animations/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heyderekj/revisemy/review-animations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heyderekj/revisemy/review-animations.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01921 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00960 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00384 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
review-animations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 113 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A da7ffae44f21
review-animations is a skill published in the GitHub repository heyderekj/revisemy (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,921 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
critique-theater
Five-dimension design quality review — score the artifact against craft, brand, accessibility, and copy, then fix what falls short before handing it over.
nw-fp-usable-design
Naming conventions, API ergonomics, and usability patterns for functional code.
code-quality-principles
Applies KISS, YAGNI, and SOLID principles for clean code with reduced complexity. Use when refactoring or reviewing code for over-engineering.
ss-review
Review UI code for design system compliance, accessibility, and best practices.
xxd-content-series
Design reusable Chinese traditional color systems for content series. Use when a user needs color rules for Xiaohongshu covers, WeChat articles, video thumbnails, course slides, newsletters, recurring columns, editorial series, carousels, or multi-part content that must stay recognizable over time.
xxd-data-viz
Create chart and data visualization palettes from Chinese traditional colors. Use when a user needs categorical, sequential, diverging, highlight, dashboard, map, ECharts, D3, Chart.js, or colorblind-aware data palettes with Chinese traditional color identity.