Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hoavdc/codexkit/codexkit-strategy-scorecard-buildernpx skills add hoavdc/CodexKit --skill codexkit-strategy-scorecard-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoavdc/CodexKitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoavdc/codexkit/codexkit-strategy-scorecard-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoavdc/codexkit/codexkit-strategy-scorecard-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoavdc/codexkit/codexkit-strategy-scorecard-builder.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00069 | $0.00657 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00329 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
codexkit-strategy-scorecard-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Strategy Scorecard Builder
Purpose
Turn strategy language into a measurable operating system that leaders can review and steer.
When to use
- A company or function needs a balanced scorecard or strategy map.
- Leadership wants objectives, measures, and initiatives tied together.
- Teams need to bridge strategy into quarterly execution.
When not to use
- The request is a loose ideation session with no horizon or accountability.
- The user only needs a generic KPI list with no strategy context.
Inputs
- strategic themes, ambition, and leadership priorities
- current KPIs, customer outcomes, and financial goals
- process bottlenecks and capability gaps
- current initiatives or portfolio constraints
Procedure
- Clarify the strategic themes and the change they are meant to create.
- Build the logic chain across financial, customer, process, and capability layers.
- Define a small set of measures, targets, and owners for each theme.
- Link initiatives and quarterly OKRs to the scorecard instead of treating them separately.
- Highlight conflicts, missing measures, and overloaded initiative portfolios.
- Recommend a review cadence and escalation logic.
Output
- strategy map
- balanced scorecard table
- OKR and initiative bridge
- review cadence and ownership model
- open gaps or decisions
Definition of done
- Measures and targets clearly support the strategy.
- Owners and review cadence are explicit.
- The output shows how strategy connects to execution.
Examples
- "Design a balanced scorecard for our operations and customer teams."
- "Translate this strategy deck into a scorecard and quarterly execution bridge."
Quality Criteria
- All claims reference specific frameworks, standards, or quantifiable data
- Content matches the stated audience's expertise level
- Recommendations are actionable — each includes a concrete next step
- No unsupported assertions or generic filler language
Verification (4C)
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Correctness | Do referenced frameworks and standards match their official definitions? |
| Completeness | Are all key concepts covered without significant gaps for the stated audience? |
| Context-fit | Would this be useful for someone new to this domain, or is it too advanced/too basic? |
| Consequence | If a stakeholder acted on this immediately, what could they misinterpret? |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 85 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A d9edfa64d576
codexkit-strategy-scorecard-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository hoavdc/CodexKit (21 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 657 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
knowledge_base
Manage the user's personal knowledge base — knowledge graph, documents, and wiki vault.
reducing-aigc-detection
Systematically reduce AIGC detection rates in academic papers (Chinese/English). Analyzes detection reports, identifies high-impact sections, applies multi-layer rewriting strategies preserving formatting/footnotes, and verifies results. Supports 维普/知网/Turnitin platforms.
architecting-security
安全架构与治理：威胁建模 (STRIDE/PASTA/LINDDUN)、零信任身份架构、IAM/SSO/MFA/PAM、合规框架 (SOC2/PCI/HIPAA/GDPR)、DLP、隐私工程、安全控制设计。Use when designing security architecture, threat modeling new systems, implementing zero-trust identity, designing IAM/SSO/PAM, building compliance evidence chains, or planning privacy-by-design.
defending-applications
Application security defense knowledge for builders. Covers Web/API/GraphQL hardening (XSS/SQLi/SSRF/IDOR/BOLA/Mass Assignment/deserialization/upload/path traversal), authentication/authorization (OAuth 2.0/OIDC/JWT/Session/Cookie/SAML/SSO), and LLM application security (prompt injection, jailbreak, RAG poisoning…
detecting-and-responding
蓝队与紫队工程：检测规则编写、SIEM/EDR 调优、事件响应、数字取证、威胁狩猎、ATT&CK 映射、紫队演练闭环。Use when writing Sigma/YARA detection rules, tuning SIEM noise, responding to security incidents, conducting forensic analysis, hunting threats, or running purple team exercises.
securing-cloud-and-supply-chain
云原生与软件供应链安全防御。容器/K8s 加固、Service Mesh、CI/CD 安全、SLSA/SBOM/Sigstore、云 IAM、Secrets 管理、IaC 安全。Use when hardening Kubernetes clusters, auditing CI/CD pipelines, implementing supply chain security, managing cloud IAM, or reviewing IaC code.