Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill deviation-score-computation-and-interpretationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collectionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/deviation-score-computation-and-interpretation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/deviation-score-computation-and-interpretation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/deviation-score-computation-and-interpretation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/deviation-score-computation-and-interpretation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/deviation-score-computation-and-interpretation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.01579 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00790 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00316 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00158 |
Grade A, and why
deviation-score-computation-and-interpretation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deviation-score computation and interpretation
Summary
Compute bias-corrected deviation scores that quantify motif-associated variability in chromatin accessibility across samples using chromVAR's computeDeviations function. This skill enables identification of transcription factor motifs driving cell-to-cell or sample-to-sample epigenetic heterogeneity in ATAC-seq data.
When to use
Apply this skill when you have filtered ATAC-seq peak counts, matched motifs to those peaks, and want to measure which transcription factor motifs show elevated or reduced accessibility relative to GC-content and accessibility-matched background expectations—particularly when annotating TF motif usage across cell populations or when exploring which regulatory elements drive chromatin variability.
When NOT to use
- Input peak counts are not filtered by sample quality (depth < 1500 reads or in-peak fraction < 0.15); filterSamples must precede this skill.
- Peaks have not been reduced to non-overlapping set; overlapping peaks violate the background-matching assumptions underlying bias correction.
- Motifs have not been matched to peaks; computeDeviations requires an explicit motif match matrix, not raw motif sequences.
Inputs
- SummarizedExperiment object with filtered peak counts (samples × peaks)
- GC bias annotations in rowData (output from addGCBias)
- Expected accessibility matrix (output from computeExpectations)
- Motif-to-peak match matrix (logical matrix from matchMotifs)
- Background peak indices (output from getBackgroundPeaks)
Outputs
- chromVARDeviations SummarizedExperiment object with two assays: 'deviations' (bias-corrected z-scores, motifs × samples) and 'deviationScores' (raw deviations, motifs × samples)
- Row names correspond to motif identifiers
- Column names correspond to sample/cell identifiers
How to apply
After filtering samples (min_depth ≥1500, min_in_peaks ≥0.15) and peaks (non-overlapping set), add GC content bias to rowData using addGCBias() with the reference genome, compute expected accessibility using computeExpectations() on filtered counts, and generate GC- and accessibility-matched background peaks using getBackgroundPeaks(). Then invoke computeDeviations() with the filtered SummarizedExperiment object, motif match matrix (from matchMotifs), background peaks, and expected accessibility; this returns a SummarizedExperiment with two assays: 'deviations' (bias-corrected z-scores) and 'deviationScores' (raw deviation magnitudes). Validate the output by checking that row count equals motif count, column count equals sample count, and that score distributions reflect expected variability patterns without extreme outliers.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 111 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 0720387b392b
deviation-score-computation-and-interpretation is a skill published in the GitHub repository HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections (15 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,579 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
external-model-validation
Use when validating an existing prognostic risk signature on an external bulk expression cohort with survival outcomes, producing risk scores, Kaplan-Meier curves, risk distribution plots, heatmap, and time-dependent ROC curves. NOT for: model training, feature selection, nomogram construction, calibration analysis…
medical-research-literature-reader-pro
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title.…
adverse-event-narrative
Generates CIOMS I-compliant ICSR narratives from adverse event case data for FDA and EMA regulatory submission. Includes temporal analysis, MedDRA coding, causality assessment using WHO-UMC or Naranjo criteria, and multi-format output.
anatomy-quiz-master
Generate interactive anatomy quizzes for medical education with multiple.
decision-curve-analysis
Use when evaluating the clinical utility of a binary prediction model from a single clinical CSV file by fitting a logistic decision-curve model, plotting decision and clinical-impact curves, and exporting summary outputs. NOT for: survival calibration, ROC-only discrimination analysis, nomogram construction, or…
elastic-net-feature-selection
Use when selecting predictive genes or other molecular features from bulk expression matrices for binary case-vs-control classification with elastic net logistic regression, including coefficient path and cross-validation plots. Trigger keywords: elastic net, glmnet, feature selection, binary classification…