Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill numeric-range-validation-bioinformaticsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collectionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/numeric-range-validation-bioinformatics)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/numeric-range-validation-bioinformatics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/numeric-range-validation-bioinformatics/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/numeric-range-validation-bioinformatics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/numeric-range-validation-bioinformatics.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01500 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00750 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00300 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00150 |
Grade A, and why
numeric-range-validation-bioinformatics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
numeric-range-validation-bioinformatics
Summary
Validate that computed quantitative genomic features (e.g., insulation scores, contact frequencies) fall within mathematically and biologically expected numeric ranges and that derived boolean annotations (e.g., TAD boundary flags) are correctly typed. This skill ensures data integrity and identifies computational or thresholding errors before downstream analysis.
When to use
After applying a quantitative analysis function (e.g., cooltools.insulation, contact frequency calculations) to Hi-C cooler files or other genomic datasets, validate that the output numeric columns contain values within plausible ranges (e.g., insulation scores as floats, not NaN unless expected; boundary calls as strict boolean 0/1 or True/False) and that no unexpected outliers or type mismatches have been introduced.
When NOT to use
- Input data are already a quality-controlled, published feature table from a trusted source (e.g., GEO deposit with peer-reviewed validation).
- Analysis goal is exploratory or hypothesis-generating and does not require strict quality gates.
- Numeric values are intentionally sparse or contain expected NaN by design (e.g., regions filtered for low coverage); in such cases, validate sparsity pattern separately rather than enforcing full range.
Inputs
- pandas DataFrame with computed Hi-C features (insulation scores, contact frequencies, or similar)
- cooler file (HDF5 contact matrix) with bin metadata
- window size parameter (integer, in base pairs) used in feature computation
Outputs
- validated pandas DataFrame with confirmed dtype and value range integrity
- BED format file with validated boundary annotations (optional)
- validation report or assertion log confirming range and type checks passed
How to apply
Load the output table (typically as a pandas DataFrame) and inspect the dtype and value ranges of numeric columns. For insulation scores, verify that values are floating-point numbers without unexpected NaN clusters unrelated to low-coverage regions, and that the range is bounded by the definition of the metric (e.g., normalized ratios should not exceed physically plausible limits). For boundary annotations, confirm that is_boundary_* columns are strictly boolean (dtype: bool or int 0/1). Check that row counts match expected bin coordinates and that required columns (e.g., region1, region2, insulation_score, is_boundary_{window}) are all present. Use pandas describe(), dtypes inspection, and assertions on min/max values to programmatically enforce these invariants before exporting to BED or other downstream formats.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 101 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 622d3d259009
numeric-range-validation-bioinformatics is a skill published in the GitHub repository HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections (15 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,500 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
external-model-validation
Use when validating an existing prognostic risk signature on an external bulk expression cohort with survival outcomes, producing risk scores, Kaplan-Meier curves, risk distribution plots, heatmap, and time-dependent ROC curves. NOT for: model training, feature selection, nomogram construction, calibration analysis…
medical-research-literature-reader-pro
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title.…
adverse-event-narrative
Generates CIOMS I-compliant ICSR narratives from adverse event case data for FDA and EMA regulatory submission. Includes temporal analysis, MedDRA coding, causality assessment using WHO-UMC or Naranjo criteria, and multi-format output.
anatomy-quiz-master
Generate interactive anatomy quizzes for medical education with multiple.
decision-curve-analysis
Use when evaluating the clinical utility of a binary prediction model from a single clinical CSV file by fitting a logistic decision-curve model, plotting decision and clinical-impact curves, and exporting summary outputs. NOT for: survival calibration, ROC-only discrimination analysis, nomogram construction, or…
elastic-net-feature-selection
Use when selecting predictive genes or other molecular features from bulk expression matrices for binary case-vs-control classification with elastic net logistic regression, including coefficient path and cross-validation plots. Trigger keywords: elastic net, glmnet, feature selection, binary classification…