Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill spectral-embedding-scalability-benchmarkinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collectionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/spectral-embedding-scalability-benchmarking)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/spectral-embedding-scalability-benchmarking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/spectral-embedding-scalability-benchmarking/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/spectral-embedding-scalability-benchmarking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/spectral-embedding-scalability-benchmarking.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.01773 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00886 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00355 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00177 |
Grade A, and why
spectral-embedding-scalability-benchmarking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
spectral-embedding-scalability-benchmarking
Summary
Benchmark the matrix-free spectral embedding algorithm (tl.spectral) in SnapATAC2 to validate its claimed linear time and space complexity when applied to single-cell datasets of 10 million or more cells. This skill confirms scalability performance through empirical measurement of runtime and peak memory consumption against the theoretical complexity claim.
When to use
Apply this skill when you have a large single-cell count matrix (≥10 million cells) in CSR format and need to verify whether the matrix-free spectral embedding in SnapATAC2 achieves its documented linear scaling behavior on your hardware and dataset characteristics. Use it as a validation step before committing large-scale analyses or as a performance regression test when upgrading SnapATAC2 versions.
When NOT to use
- Input matrix is already embedded or has been pre-reduced to <10 million cells; use this skill only when validating large-scale scalability is the explicit goal.
- You lack memory profiling tools or cannot isolate the spectral embedding step from the surrounding pipeline; meaningful benchmarking requires isolated, repeatable measurement.
- The research question does not concern algorithmic scalability or performance validation; if you only need the embedding result, apply tl.spectral directly without instrumentation.
Inputs
- Single-cell count matrix with ≥10 million cells in CSR (compressed sparse row) format
- SnapATAC2 AnnData object or compatible matrix container
Outputs
- Wall-clock runtime measurements (seconds) as a function of cell count
- Peak memory usage profile (megabytes or gigabytes) throughout spectral decomposition
- Spectral embedding matrix with weighted eigenvectors
- Performance plot comparing observed time/space complexity to linear scaling expectation
How to apply
Load or generate a single-cell count matrix with ≥10 million cells and initialize it in CSR format compatible with SnapATAC2. Execute tl.spectral using the default cosine similarity metric (as of Release 2.3.0) while capturing wall-clock runtime using Python's time module or system profiler (e.g., cProfile). Monitor peak memory usage throughout spectral decomposition using a memory profiler such as memory_profiler or psutil. Document the number of eigenvectors returned and verify they are weighted by eigenvalues (default behavior in Release 2.3.0) to confirm correct output structure. Finally, plot the measured execution time and peak memory against dataset size and compare the observed slopes to the linear complexity claim; deviation from linearity may indicate algorithmic, hardware, or data-specific constraints.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 110 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 129785bca15d
spectral-embedding-scalability-benchmarking is a skill published in the GitHub repository HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections (15 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,773 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
external-model-validation
Use when validating an existing prognostic risk signature on an external bulk expression cohort with survival outcomes, producing risk scores, Kaplan-Meier curves, risk distribution plots, heatmap, and time-dependent ROC curves. NOT for: model training, feature selection, nomogram construction, calibration analysis…
medical-research-literature-reader-pro
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title.…
adverse-event-narrative
Generates CIOMS I-compliant ICSR narratives from adverse event case data for FDA and EMA regulatory submission. Includes temporal analysis, MedDRA coding, causality assessment using WHO-UMC or Naranjo criteria, and multi-format output.
anatomy-quiz-master
Generate interactive anatomy quizzes for medical education with multiple.
decision-curve-analysis
Use when evaluating the clinical utility of a binary prediction model from a single clinical CSV file by fitting a logistic decision-curve model, plotting decision and clinical-impact curves, and exporting summary outputs. NOT for: survival calibration, ROC-only discrimination analysis, nomogram construction, or…
elastic-net-feature-selection
Use when selecting predictive genes or other molecular features from bulk expression matrices for binary case-vs-control classification with elastic net logistic regression, including coefficient path and cross-validation plots. Trigger keywords: elastic net, glmnet, feature selection, binary classification…