Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill statistical-test-comparisongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collectionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/statistical-test-comparison)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/statistical-test-comparison"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/statistical-test-comparison/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/statistical-test-comparison"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/holobiomicslab/asb-skill-collections/statistical-test-comparison.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01922 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00961 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00384 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
statistical-test-comparison scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
statistical-test-comparison
Summary
Compare statistical test stringency and multiple-testing correction outcomes (q-value distributions, test type, variance adjustment) between corrected and uncorrected differential methylation analyses to verify that overdispersion correction produces more conservative significance thresholds.
When to use
When you have run differential methylation analysis in methylKit and need to validate whether overdispersion correction (overdispersion='MN') produces appropriately stringent statistical tests. Apply this skill when comparing a corrected run (with overdispersion='MN' and test='Chisq') against a parallel uncorrected baseline (overdispersion=FALSE) to confirm the correction adjusts variance for excess dispersion and makes p-value/q-value thresholds more conservative.
When NOT to use
- Input methylBase object has <3 replicates per group — Fisher's exact test (not logistic regression or F-test) will be used, and overdispersion correction assumptions may not hold.
- Samples have already been filtered to remove low-coverage bases or PCR bias artifacts — comparison may conflate the effects of coverage filtering with overdispersion correction.
- Goal is exploratory rather than hypothesis-testing — a single uncorrected run may suffice; side-by-side comparison adds computational burden without validation value.
Inputs
- methylBase object (unified methylation data across samples and sites)
- methylKit R package with dataSim() simulation or imported bisulfite sequencing data
Outputs
- q-value distribution from overdispersion='MN' corrected run
- q-value distribution from uncorrected (overdispersion=FALSE) baseline run
- comparative summary statistics (mean, median, range of q-values per method)
- count of significantly differential sites at fixed q-value threshold (e.g., q < 0.01) per method
How to apply
Execute calculateDiffMeth() on a unified methylBase object twice: once with overdispersion='MN' and test='Chisq', and once with overdispersion=FALSE (or default uncorrected mode). Extract the q-value distributions from both runs and compare their central tendencies, ranges, and proportions of sites passing a common significance cutoff (e.g., q < 0.01). The overdispersion='MN' mode applies a scaling parameter φ = X²/(N−P) to adjust variance as φ·n_i·π̂_i·(1−π̂_i), and automatically switches to an F-test from Chi-square, which should result in higher (more stringent) q-values on average. Verify that the corrected method produces visibly elevated median and mean q-values and a smaller proportion of sites meeting a fixed q-value threshold compared to the uncorrected baseline.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 106 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 1442f817ec5c
statistical-test-comparison is a skill published in the GitHub repository HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections (15 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,922 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
external-model-validation
Use when validating an existing prognostic risk signature on an external bulk expression cohort with survival outcomes, producing risk scores, Kaplan-Meier curves, risk distribution plots, heatmap, and time-dependent ROC curves. NOT for: model training, feature selection, nomogram construction, calibration analysis…
medical-research-literature-reader-pro
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title.…
adverse-event-narrative
Generates CIOMS I-compliant ICSR narratives from adverse event case data for FDA and EMA regulatory submission. Includes temporal analysis, MedDRA coding, causality assessment using WHO-UMC or Naranjo criteria, and multi-format output.
anatomy-quiz-master
Generate interactive anatomy quizzes for medical education with multiple.
decision-curve-analysis
Use when evaluating the clinical utility of a binary prediction model from a single clinical CSV file by fitting a logistic decision-curve model, plotting decision and clinical-impact curves, and exporting summary outputs. NOT for: survival calibration, ROC-only discrimination analysis, nomogram construction, or…
elastic-net-feature-selection
Use when selecting predictive genes or other molecular features from bulk expression matrices for binary case-vs-control classification with elastic net logistic regression, including coefficient path and cross-validation plots. Trigger keywords: elastic net, glmnet, feature selection, binary classification…