Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add human-avatar/skills-for-humanity --skill s4h-creativitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanityWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-creativity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-creativity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-creativity/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-creativity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-creativity.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Anti-Refusal · line 92 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 140 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.02060 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01030 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00412 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00206 |
Grade A, and why
s4h-creativity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Creativity
Applies creative thinking to any challenge. Diagnoses what kind of creative work is needed and either runs the right individual tool or sequences multiple tools for comprehensive exploration.
Which tool fits
| You need to... | Tool |
|---|---|
| Question whether the problem itself is framed correctly | assumption-excavator |
| Escape a dominant idea you keep returning to | lateral-thinking |
| See all options before choosing any | alternatives / concept-fan |
| Evaluate a specific idea fairly, without snap judgment | plus-minus-interesting |
| Think through something from multiple perspectives | six-hats |
| Think from other people's actual positions | other-perspectives |
| Explore without premature judgment | water-logic |
| Break fixation with a random jolt | random-entry |
| Use an absurd premise as a springboard | provocation |
| Consider all factors before deciding | consider-factors |
| Comprehensive multi-method session | run the full sequence below |
Routing Decision
Framing check: Confirm the specific challenge or problem before continuing. State what you've identified — the actual creative challenge and its key parameters — in one sentence, then use AskUserQuestion:
-
Question: "I'm reading this as: [your one-sentence framing of the specific challenge]. Is that right?"
-
Header: "Framing"
-
Options:
- Yes — proceed — framing is correct
- Adjust — one element is off; user will correct it before you continue
- Reframe — different situation than read; incorporate the correction before proceeding
-
Problem framing might itself be wrong → assumption-excavator (run before anything else)
-
Stuck in one direction, keep returning to the same idea → lateral-thinking
-
Need to see the full option space before choosing → alternatives or concept-fan
-
Have a specific idea to evaluate → plus-minus-interesting
-
Need full multi-perspective analysis → six-hats
-
Decision affects other people → other-perspectives
-
Early exploration, premature judgment is the enemy → water-logic
-
Thoroughly stuck, need outside stimulus → random-entry
-
Need a deliberate jolt into the impossible → provocation
-
About to act, want to make sure nothing is missed → consider-factors
-
Big challenge, want everything applied → run the full brainstorm sequence
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 183 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A f621a3837b4f
s4h-creativity is a skill published in the GitHub repository human-avatar/skills-for-humanity (223 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 2,060 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
scamper
Generate creative ideas by applying seven lenses: Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to other uses, Eliminate, Reverse.
capcut-edit
Edit CapCut / JianYing video projects — read and write subtitles, timing, speed, volume, templates, animations (fade/ken-burns), and cut long-form to shorts. Use when the user mentions capcut, jianying, subtitles, video editing, draftcontent.json, draftinfo.json, or cutting videos.
teaser-video
Film, cut, and deliver a short teaser/demo video of any app by driving it with Playwright and editing with ffmpeg - storyboard, authenticated capture, PII review, animated title cards, MP4 + GIF. Use for "make a teaser", "record a demo video", "product launch video", "screen recording for the README".
voice
Voice — text-to-speech and transcription. Triggers on /agent:voice, /agent:voice status, /agent:voice setup, /agent:voice test, "configurar voz", "prueba voz", "voice setup", "speak this", "read this aloud", "transcribe audio".
repo-visuals
Create hero visuals — animated GIF, static PNG, or animated SVG — for GitHub repositories. Runs a structured discovery conversation (scan repo → recommend format → propose creative scenarios → agree on a brief), then designs bespoke HTML/SVG, previews it in the browser, and exports. Use when the user asks for a README…
inspirer
Use when the user invokes /evo:inspirer or asks to brainstorm creatively, think outside the box, explore unconventional approaches, break out of stagnation, or generate research-backed ideas with provocation lenses.