cpp-testing

A guide for writing and maintaining C++ tests with GoogleTest, GoogleMock, CMake, and CTest. TDD means writing a failing test first, making it pass, and then improving the code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Create unit and integration tests, configure test discovery, diagnose flaky tests, add coverage or sanitizers, and decide which test commands to run.
Why use it?
It helps developers choose test boundaries, isolate dependencies, investigate failures, and add reliable checks without running unnecessary work.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/junmystery/agent-guidance-python/cpp-testing
Any agent
npx skills add JunMystery/Agent-Guidance-Python --skill cpp-testing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JunMystery/Agent-Guidance-Python

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,293 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00034 $0.02293
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.01146
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00459
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00229

Measured yesterday against content hash a92fb5da9b7e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cpp-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to cpp-testing — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/cpp-testing/SKILL.md · 326 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 326 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

C++ Testing (Agent Skill)

Agent-focused testing workflow for modern C++ (C++17/20) using GoogleTest/GoogleMock with CMake/CTest.

When to Use

  • Writing new C++ tests or fixing existing tests
  • Designing unit/integration test coverage for C++ components
  • Adding test coverage, CI gating, or regression protection
  • Configuring CMake/CTest workflows for consistent execution
  • Investigating test failures or flaky behavior
  • Enabling sanitizers for memory/race diagnostics

When NOT to Use

  • Implementing new product features without test changes
  • Large-scale refactors unrelated to test coverage or failures
  • Performance tuning without test regressions to validate
  • Non-C++ projects or non-test tasks

Core Concepts

  • TDD loop: red → green → refactor (tests first, minimal fix, then cleanups).
  • Isolation: prefer dependency injection and fakes over global state.
  • Test layout: tests/unit, tests/integration, tests/testdata.
  • Mocks vs fakes: mock for interactions, fake for stateful behavior.
  • CTest discovery: use gtest_discover_tests() for stable test discovery.
  • CI signal: run subset first, then full suite with --output-on-failure.

TDD Workflow

Follow the RED → GREEN → REFACTOR loop:

  1. RED: write a failing test that captures the new behavior
  2. GREEN: implement the smallest change to pass
  3. REFACTOR: clean up while tests stay green
// tests/add_test.cpp
#include <gtest/gtest.h>

int Add(int a, int b); // Provided by production code.

TEST(AddTest, AddsTwoNumbers) { // RED
  EXPECT_EQ(Add(2, 3), 5);
}

// src/add.cpp
int Add(int a, int b) { // GREEN
  return a + b;
}

// REFACTOR: simplify/rename once tests pass

Code Examples

Basic Unit Test (gtest)

// tests/calculator_test.cpp
#include <gtest/gtest.h>

int Add(int a, int b); // Provided by production code.

TEST(CalculatorTest, AddsTwoNumbers) {
    EXPECT_EQ(Add(2, 3), 5);
}

Fixture (gtest)

// tests/user_store_test.cpp
// Pseudocode stub: replace UserStore/User with project types.
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <memory>
#include <optional>
#include <string>

struct User { std::string name; };
class UserStore {
public:
    explicit UserStore(std::string /*path*/) {}
    void Seed(std::initializer_list<User> /*users*/) {}
    std::optional<User> Find(const std::string &/*name*/) { return User{"alice"}; }
};

class UserStoreTest : public ::testing::Test {
protected:
    void SetUp() override {
        store = std::make_unique<UserStore>(":memory:");
        store->Seed({{"alice"}, {"bob"}});
    }

    std::unique_ptr<UserStore> store;
};

TEST_F(UserStoreTest, FindsExistingUser) {
    auto user = store->Find("alice");
    ASSERT_TRUE(user.has_value());
    EXPECT_EQ(user->name, "alice");
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 326 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 326 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A a92fb5da9b7e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cpp-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository JunMystery/Agent-Guidance-Python (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 2,293 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to cpp-testing, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

common-feedback-reporter

Pre-write audit for skill violations: checks planned code against loaded skill anti-patterns before any file write. Use when writing Flutter/Dart/TS code or editing SKILL.md files with active project skills. Load as composite; on auto-fixed violation, also load +common/common-learning-log.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 63 tokens

common-exploit-verification

Enforce "No Exploit, No Report" policy with PoC construction standards, false-positive filtering, and evidence collection per vulnerability class across backend, frontend, and mobile. Use when validating security findings, constructing exploit proofs, filtering false positives, or writing pentest findings.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 61 tokens

common-session-retrospective

Analyze conversation corrections to detect skill gaps and prepare targeted skill-library maintenance tasks. Use after any session with user corrections, rework, or retrospective requests. After finding correction loops, also load +common/common-learning-log to persist mistake entries to AGENTSLEARNING.md.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 59 tokens

common-store-changelog

Generate user-facing release notes for the App Store and Google Play from git history (App Store <=4000 chars, Google Play <=500). Use when generating release notes, app store changelog, play store release, or "what's new" text for a mobile app.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 60 tokens

common-code-review

Conduct high-quality, persona-driven code reviews. Use when reviewing PRs, critiquing code quality, or analyzing changes for team feedback.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 32 tokens

common-workflow-writing

Rules for writing concise, token-efficient workflow and skill files. Prevents over-building that requires costly optimization passes. Use when creating or editing workflow files, SKILL.md files, or new skill definitions.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 45 tokens