Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmpnpx agentmods add skills/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp/walkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp/walk)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp/walk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp/walk/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp/walk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp/walk.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00164 | $0.01063 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00066 | $0.00425 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
walk scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
The walk — the user always knows where we are and whose turn it is
Every governed change is a walk through six stages, spoken ONLY in this vocabulary
wherever the human reads (chat, cards, commit prose): Decide · Design · Contract ·
Build · Prove · Sign-off. The mapping is mechanical — Decide=the brief, Design=the
rendered screens, Contract=the spec, Build=code+citing tests, Prove=the lane's receipt,
Sign-off=acceptance — and spec clauses are spoken as promises ("Contract: 7
promises agreed" · "Build: keeping promise 5 of 7" · "Prove: all promises kept,
evidence attached"). node qa/walk-status.mjs derives the live position; a
UserPromptSubmit hook injects it every prompt. Render the injected state — never
your memory of it.
At kickoff (with the triage restatement): print the itinerary — and DECLARE it as the live chain, so the studio's Drive strip and the statusline's readers see the same steps you just printed:
Navigation redesign — the journey (brief lane)
Decide → Design → Contract → Build → Prove → Sign-off
Stops for you: 3 (Decide — now · Contract · Sign-off). Build and Prove never stop for you.
First stop is now: 2 open decisions below.
node qa/plan.mjs --set "sign the brief | draft screens | agree the promises | build | full check | your sign-off" --title "navigation redesign"
The chain is an offer, not an announcement (drive-narration N6): show the declared
steps in your first reply and invite the reshape in one breath — "say the word and I'll
reorder" — then start work immediately; the chain gates nothing, so the offer never
blocks. If the human redirects, re-declare (--set again) without ceremony: their
reshape IS the new chain.
The chain stays current — this is part of the contract, not a nicety: advance it
with node qa/plan.mjs --step N as each step lands and --done when the request
lands (closing writes the request's line into the local trail the studio's Recent
requests fold shows). The current request itself is recorded mechanically (the
per-prompt hook), the steps are yours to declare, and every surface shows the
declaration's age — a stale chain reads as stale to the human watching the studio,
which is worse than no chain. While the full check runs, the chain's observed line
narrates the lane's own position (step, elapsed, usual cost) — quote THAT, never an
estimate. The chain gates nothing; the walk stays the truth for doneness.
While a walk is open, the per-prompt inject carries the running protocol — the [studio: …]
line (restore it if DOWN: the cmp-inspector preview { projectDir } tool, or tell the human once),
the [chat header] to open every reply with, verbatim, and the ▲ ARRIVED, UNPLANNED line for work
that belongs to no open walk (default: after the current walk lands; one walk at a time). Render the
injected lines, never your memory of them; with no walk open it delivers nothing and you write none
of it. After the header: one line per stage transition, nothing per-file.
At every human gate — loud: a full stop card, never a bare question — and the easiest act leads:
■ YOUR TURN — <feature> · stage 3 of 6: Contract — agreeing what it promises
<what it is, in plain words — two lines maximum>
→ Easiest: the studio console at <url from the injected card> — the row carries the button.
→ CLI fallback: <the command> (or "reply approve" when no console is up)
After this: <the remaining stages, and which ones stop for the human>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago First seen · 69 lines · 164 tokens per session scan A 6821b5bdb378
walk is a skill published in the GitHub repository kvdm-co-pilot/create-cmp (0 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 164 tokens to every session and 1,063 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
compose-multiplatform
Use when building one shared Compose UI in Kotlin across Android, iOS, and desktop — commonMain @Composables, expect/actual, source-set placement, native interop, multiplatform ViewModel/navigation/Koin. NOT a single-platform native build (that is kotlin-android / swift-ios), and NOT Dart/Flutter cross-platform UI…
m3-expressive
Material 3 Expressive design patterns for Jetpack Compose - expressive theming, motion physics, shape morphing, typography emphasis, color emphasis, and all 28 expressive components.
liquid-glass
Apple Liquid Glass design patterns for SwiftUI iOS 26 - glass effects, morphing, containers, interactive glass, tinting, accessibility, and cross-platform glass design.
android-device-integrity
Android app/device integrity and anti-fraud for a fintech app — the Play Integrity API (com.google.android.play:integrity): Standard requests (StandardIntegrityManager.prepareIntegrityToken → StandardIntegrityTokenProvider.request with a requestHash → StandardIntegrityToken) vs Classic requests…
offline-first
Offline-first architecture patterns - NetworkBoundResource, sync strategies, conflict resolution, cache invalidation, and connectivity monitoring.
app-store-review
Audit an iOS app's App Store submission readiness and rejection risk for a fintech app — App Review Guidelines domains (Safety/Performance/Business/Design/Legal), PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy (NSPrivacyAccessedAPITypes required-reason APIs, NSPrivacyTrackingDomains, NSPrivacyCollectedDataTypes), App Privacy nutrition labels…