Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Lambenthan/empiricalwiki. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Lambenthan/empiricalwiki/main/.claude/skills/daily-arxiv/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lambenthan/empiricalwikiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/daily-arxiv)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/daily-arxiv"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/daily-arxiv/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/daily-arxiv"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/daily-arxiv.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.03147 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01573 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00629 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00315 |
Grade A, and why
daily-arxiv scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 239 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/daily-arxiv
每日从 arXiv RSS 拉取新论文,基于 wiki 中的研究方向和概念自动判断相关性, 对高相关论文调用 /ingest 完整纳入 wiki,检测 SOTA 更新,生成 digest 日志。 支持 cron 调度自动执行,也可手动触发。
Inputs
--hours N:拉取最近 N 小时的论文(默认 24)--max-ingest N:单次最多 ingest 篇数(默认 5,防止 wiki 过载)--dry-run:仅生成 digest,不执行 ingest--categories:覆盖默认 arXiv 分类(默认 cs.LG cs.CV cs.CL cs.AI stat.ML)
Outputs
raw/discovered/{slug}/或raw/discovered/{slug}.pdf— 每篇 auto-ingest 论文对应的抓取原始来源wiki/papers/{slug}.md— 高相关论文页面(通过 /ingest 创建)- 相应的 concepts/、people/、claims/ 页面(通过 /ingest 创建)
- 更新的
wiki/topics/*.md— SOTA tracker 标注(若检测到 SOTA 更新) - 更新的
wiki/graph/— edges.jsonl, context_brief.md, open_questions.md(通过 /ingest 维护) - 更新的
wiki/index.md和wiki/log.md
Wiki Interaction
Reads
wiki/topics/*.md— 提取 Overview 关键词和 SOTA tracker,用于相关性判断和 SOTA 检测wiki/concepts/*.md— 提取 Definition 关键词,辅助相关性判断wiki/index.md— 检查论文是否已收录(按 arXiv URL 去重)wiki/papers/*.md— 检查 arxiv ID 是否已存在wiki/graph/open_questions.md— 优先 ingest 能填补知识缺口的论文
Writes
wiki/papers/{slug}.md— 通过 /ingest CREATEwiki/concepts/{slug}.md— 通过 /ingest CREATE/EDITwiki/people/{slug}.md— 通过 /ingest CREATE/EDITwiki/claims/{slug}.md— 通过 /ingest CREATE/EDITwiki/topics/{slug}.md— EDIT(SOTA tracker 标注)wiki/graph/edges.jsonl— 通过 /ingest APPENDwiki/graph/context_brief.md— REBUILD(最终一次)wiki/graph/open_questions.md— REBUILD(最终一次)wiki/index.md— 通过 /ingest EDITwiki/log.md— APPEND
Graph edges created
- 通过 /ingest 创建的所有 edges(paper → concept, paper → claim 等)
Workflow
前置:确认工作目录为 wiki 项目根(包含 wiki/、raw/、tools/ 的目录)。
设 WIKI_ROOT=wiki/。
Step 1: 拉取 arXiv RSS + 热门论文
- 运行 fetch_arxiv.py 获取新论文列表:
python3 tools/fetch_arxiv.py --hours <hours> -o /tmp/arxiv_feed.json - 获取 DeepXiv 热门论文(过去 7 天):
将热门论文合并到候选列表中(按 arxiv_id 去重),热门论文在后续评分中获得额外关注。 若 DeepXiv 不可用:跳过此子步骤,仅使用 RSS 结果。python3 tools/fetch_deepxiv.py trending --days 7 --limit 20 - 解析结果,获取论文列表(title, abstract, authors, arxiv_url, arxiv_id, category)
- 去重:读取
wiki/index.md,跳过 arxiv URL 已在 wiki 中的论文。同时检查wiki/papers/目录下已有的 arxiv ID。 - 若无新论文,直接跳到 Step 6 生成空 digest。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 239 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 93bee00bed00
daily-arxiv is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lambenthan/empiricalwiki (83 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 3,147 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-reproducibility
Enforce the replication-protocol.md rule by cross-checking numeric claims in a manuscript against the actual R / Stata / Python outputs. Report PASS/FAIL per claim against tolerance thresholds. Use before submission and before releasing a replication package.
review-paper
Comprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees + editorial decision, calibrated to a target journal). R&R continuation via --peer --r2/--r3; hostile-editor stress test via…
grant-proposal
Scaffold a research grant proposal (NSF, NIH, ERC, or foundation) by composing existing primitives — pulls identification strategy from an /interview-me spec, delegates the data-management plan to /data-management-plan and the facilities statement to /capture-environment, and emits a funder-requirements checklist. Use…
preregister
Draft a structured preregistration document (OSF, AsPredicted, or AEA RCT Registry style) from a research spec or free-form study description. Output is a Markdown file with hypotheses, design, sampling plan, analysis plan, exclusions, and inference criteria — annotated with MUST / SHOULD / MAY clarity flags. Use when…
capture-environment
Snapshot the computational environment for a replication package — detects the analysis stack (R / Stata / Python) and emits the right lockfiles (renv.lock + sessionInfo.txt, requirements.txt / environment.yml / uv.lock, Stata version + ado package list), records seeds and RNG kind, optionally writes a pinning…
data-management-plan
Draft a funder-compliant Data Management Plan (NSF DMP, NIH DMS Policy 2023, ERC, Horizon Europe) by composing the confidential-data and environment-capture primitives. Sections cover data description, formats/metadata, storage/backup, access/sharing, preservation/archiving, and roles. Use when user says "data…