Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to lbruton/claude-context. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lbruton/claude-context/master/.agents/skills/spec-tasks/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lbruton/claude-contextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lbruton/claude-context/spec-tasks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lbruton/claude-context/spec-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lbruton/claude-context/spec-tasks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lbruton/claude-context/spec-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lbruton/claude-context/spec-tasks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01042 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00417 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00208 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
spec-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/spec-tasks ISSUE
Phase 4: turn the approach into a concrete, parallel-aware, TDD-ordered checklist in tasks.md. One artifact, then STOP.
Invocation
/spec-tasks <ISSUE-ID>
Missing <ISSUE-ID> → print Usage: /spec-tasks <ISSUE-ID> and exit.
Read first
.agents/skills/spec/references/conventions.md— folder resolution, phase-boundary discipline, unreconciled-marks pre-check.- The project's
.context/spec-conventions.md— worktree/branch convention for Cohort 0, version-lock, and the verbatim closing-task roster. .agents/skills/spec/references/templates/tasks-template.md— the canonical structure (Cohort 0 setup, A/B/C TDD cohorts, Standard Closing Tasks). Follow it; renumber only.
Steps
- Resolve the spec folder; read all three prior phase docs (
requirements,discovery,approach). - Unreconciled-marks PRE-CHECK (per conventions.md) on all three. Any unreconciled marks → STOP and name the file +
/spec-reconcile {ISSUE-ID} {phase}. - Draft
tasks.mdfrom the template:- Sprint Cohort 0 — Setup: worktree-confirmation task using the project's convention from
.context/spec-conventions.md(e.g. StakTrakr →/start-patch,patch/<version>branch). Generic fallbackspec/{ISSUE-ID}-{slug}only when no project convention exists. - TDD cohorts: A = foundation/scaffolding, B = tests (RED — failing tests encoding each EARS acceptance criterion), C = implementation (GREEN). If a task has no testable behavior, B gets a read-only justification task, not a silent skip.
- Mark parallel-safe tasks
[P]; give every task explicitFile(s):, anAcceptance:line,Maps to: AC-N, andLeverage:hints. - Standard Closing Tasks: copy from the template, bind skill names to the project roster verbatim (
/release patch,codacy-analysis-cli,/vault-update,/pr-resolve,/spec archive). Irrelevant ones →N/A — <reason>, never dropped. - Set frontmatter
approved:empty — the human stamps it.
- Sprint Cohort 0 — Setup: worktree-confirmation task using the project's convention from
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed 2aff06c729fd
- 9d ago Changed fe8d9a6daaea
- 11d ago First seen · 61 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 549cb8919f8e
spec-tasks is a skill published in the GitHub repository lbruton/claude-context (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,042 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-17.
Other skills, from other repositories
engram-testing-coverage
TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
mobiai-mobile-tdd
You MUST use this before writing any implementation code for a mobile feature, bug fix, refactor, or behavior change. Tests come before implementation — no exceptions.
tdd
This skill should be used when the user wants to implement features or fix bugs using test-driven development. Enforces the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle with vertical slicing, context isolation between test writing and implementation, human checkpoints, and auto-test feedback loops. Uses multi-agent orchestration with the…
iterative-development
TDD iteration loops using Claude Code Stop hooks - runs tests after each response, feeds failures back automatically.