Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/test-coveragenpx skills add LedgerHQ/ledger-live --skill test-coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LedgerHQ/ledger-liveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/test-coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/test-coverage.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00736 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00368 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
test-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Coverage
Increase test coverage to 90% on a target zone with iterative writing and refactoring.
Prompt Variables
$TARGET_ZONE
Directory path or Jira ticket URL for the zone to cover (e.g.,
src/mvvm/features/Accounts/orhttps://ledgerhq.atlassian.net/browse/LIVE-1234)
Instructions
Follow all conventions from the testing skill (.agents/skills/testing/SKILL.md).
Delegate test execution to the test-runner subagent throughout.
Step 1: Scope and Analyze
- If
$TARGET_ZONEis a Jira URL, fetch the ticket via Atlassian MCP and extract affected files. - Use
code-explorersubagent to analyze the zone: trace execution paths, map dependencies, and identify branching logic worth testing. - Measure current coverage:
pnpm <mobile|desktop> test:jest --coverage \ --collectCoverageFrom='<zone-glob>' \ --coverageReporters=text-summary - From the
code-exploreranalysis, build the list of files to test. Skip type definitions, barrel re-exports, and thin wrappers with no branching. - For each remaining file, ask:
- Does it contain branching logic, state transitions, or side effects?
- Would a regression break user-facing behavior?
- Is it already covered indirectly by a parent test? If all answers are no, skip.
Step 2: Write Tests
Order: pure utils -> hooks -> viewModels -> components with side effects.
For each file:
- Search existing mocks/fixtures/factories before creating new ones (see testing skill).
- Write tests following all testing skill conventions.
- Run tests via
test-runner. Fix failures before moving to the next file.
Loop until coverage >= 90%.
Step 3: Refactoring Loop
Three sequential passes. After each pass, run tests via test-runner -- they must still pass before the next pass.
Pass 1 -- Audit mocks
- For every mock (
jest.mock,jest.fn,mockReturnValue,jest.spyOn): is it asserted directly or does it enable a code path whose output is asserted? - Remove any mock that satisfies neither. Simplify over-specified mocks.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 80 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 99e4fce012a6
test-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository LedgerHQ/ledger-live (615 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 736 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…