Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Lord1Egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit --skill latex-postersgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lord1Egypt/scientific-agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/latex-posters)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/latex-posters"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/latex-posters/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/latex-posters"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/latex-posters.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.15393 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.07697 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.03079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01539 |
Grade A, and why
latex-posters scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to latex-posters — 18 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,595 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LaTeX Research Posters
Overview
Research posters are a critical medium for scientific communication at conferences, symposia, and academic events. This skill provides comprehensive guidance for creating professional, visually appealing research posters using LaTeX packages. Generate publication-quality posters with proper layout, typography, color schemes, and visual hierarchy.
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Creating research posters for conferences, symposia, or poster sessions
- Designing academic posters for university events or thesis defenses
- Preparing visual summaries of research for public engagement
- Converting scientific papers into poster format
- Creating template posters for research groups or departments
- Designing posters that comply with specific conference size requirements (A0, A1, 36×48", etc.)
- Building posters with complex multi-column layouts
- Integrating figures, tables, equations, and citations in poster format
AI-Powered Visual Element Generation
STANDARD WORKFLOW: Generate ALL major visual elements using AI before creating the LaTeX poster.
This is the recommended approach for creating visually compelling posters:
- Plan all visual elements needed (title, intro, methods, results, conclusions)
- Generate each element using scientific-schematics or Nano Banana Pro
- Assemble generated images in the LaTeX template
- Add text content around the visuals
Target: 60-70% of poster area should be AI-generated visuals, 30-40% text.
CRITICAL: Preventing Content Overflow
⚠️ POSTERS MUST NOT HAVE TEXT OR CONTENT CUT OFF AT EDGES.
Common Overflow Problems:
- Title/footer text extending beyond page boundaries
- Too many sections crammed into available space
- Figures placed too close to edges
- Text blocks exceeding column widths
Prevention Rules:
1. Limit Content Sections (MAXIMUM 5-6 sections for A0):
✅ GOOD - 5 sections with room to breathe:
- Title/Header
- Introduction/Problem
- Methods
- Results (1-2 key findings)
- Conclusions
❌ BAD - 8+ sections crammed together:
- Overview, Introduction, Background, Methods,
- Results 1, Results 2, Discussion, Conclusions, Future Work
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/baposter_template.tex 7.3 KB
- assets/beamerposter_template.tex 7.5 KB
- assets/poster_quality_checklist.md 11 KB
- assets/tikzposter_template.tex 7.7 KB
- references/latex_poster_packages.md 17 KB
- references/poster_content_guide.md 20 KB
- references/poster_design_principles.md 22 KB
- references/poster_layout_design.md 22 KB
- references/README.md 11 KB
- scripts/generate_schematic_ai.py 32 KB runs code
- scripts/generate_schematic.py 5.0 KB runs code
- scripts/review_poster.sh 7.8 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 1,595 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A fb7d0a83a73a
latex-posters is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lord1Egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 15,393 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to latex-posters, differing in 18 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
alterlab-clinical-reports
Writes comprehensive clinical reports — case reports (CARE guidelines), diagnostic reports (radiology, pathology, lab), clinical trial reports (ICH-E3, SAE, CSR), and patient documentation (SOAP notes, H&P, discharge summaries) — with templates, regulatory compliance (HIPAA, FDA, ICH-GCP), and validation tools. Use…
alterlab-clinical-decision
Generates professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings — biomarker-stratified patient cohort analyses with outcomes and evidence-based treatment recommendation reports with decision algorithms, supporting GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard…
clinical-reports
Create safety-bounded draft structures and run local deterministic checks for clinical case, diagnostic, trial, safety, and aggregate research reports. Use only with synthetic, de-identified, or aggregate inputs and verified source-fact manifests; every output requires qualified review.
pydicom
Use pydicom to read, inspect, write, transform, and safely preflight local DICOM datasets and pixel data. Applies to DICOM metadata, transfer syntaxes, compression plugins, frames, private elements, JSON, and bounded de-identification review.
pptx-posters
Create and audit editable scientific posters in macro-free PowerPoint (.pptx) from author-approved local content and assets. Use when the requested deliverable is a PowerPoint research/conference poster and exact physical, printer, accessibility, provenance, and package-security checks are required.
automated-soap-note-generator
Generate structured SOAP notes from clinical narratives, transcripts, or existing notes; use when the user needs de-identified clinical documentation organized into Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan sections, with clear assumptions and review points.