Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add MasonEgger/bpe-claude-code-plugin/plugin install bpeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/masonegger/bpe-claude-code-plugin/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/masonegger/bpe-claude-code-plugin/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/masonegger/bpe-claude-code-plugin/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/masonegger/bpe-claude-code-plugin/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/masonegger/bpe-claude-code-plugin/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.03792 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.01517 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00758 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00379 |
Grade A, and why
plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 302 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Plan Command
Flag handling
Run this check before anything else in this skill, including Tool discovery.
-
Check for
plan.mdat the repo root. -
plan.mdabsent: proceed with the rest of this skill and generate a fresh plan.--archiveand--regenare no-ops in this case. -
plan.mdpresent and neither--archivenor--regenin $ARGUMENTS: refuse and stop. Report in this shape:plan.md exists (last modified , N/M items checked). Use
--archiveto preserve it in .ai-sessions before regenerating, or--regento discard and regenerate.Fill
<date>from the file's modification time (date -r plan.md +%Y-%m-%d). FillN/Mfrom todo.md's top-level checkbox counts: N is the checked count, M the total. If todo.md is missing, write "no todo.md" in place of "N/M items checked". -
plan.mdpresent and--archivein $ARGUMENTS: run the Archive routine below, then proceed to generate a fresh plan. -
plan.mdpresent and--regenin $ARGUMENTS: deleteplan.mdandtodo.mdat the repo root (rm -f plan.md todo.md), then proceed to generate a fresh plan.
Archive routine
Referenced by the --archive flag above and by /bpe:session-summary's end-of-goal archive prompt.
The archive layout and the accomplishment.md format are canonically documented in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/session-management.md under "Plan Archives (accomplishment.md)"; read that section before step 5 below.
- Propose a slug for the archive directory based on plan.md's stated goals and the checked items in todo.md. Same 2-3 word kebab-case shape as session-summary slugs (e.g.
add-user-auth); useinitorv1when the plan has no sharper focus, such as a project's first archive. Ask the user to confirm or edit the slug. Do not touch any files until the user answers. mkdir -p .ai-sessions/<slug>/mv plan.md .ai-sessions/<slug>/plan.mdmv todo.md .ai-sessions/<slug>/todo.md- Write
.ai-sessions/<slug>/accomplishment.mdfollowing the accomplishment.md template in session-management.md. Populate it from the just-moved plan.md and todo.md plusgit logcommit subjects; the template section documents each field. - Record the archive in spec.md. Under
**Shipped:**in## Roadmap / phase log, append- <slug>: <one-line summary> (.ai-sessions/<slug>/)as the last line, taking the summary from the accomplishment.md title and its Convergence line. If the list still reads- none yet, replace that line instead of appending. If spec.md has no## Roadmap / phase logsection (a spec written before the section existed), skip this step and tell the user; do not add the section here. - Proceed to generate a fresh plan (the rest of this skill).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +11 lines 1136f751de9f
- 1mo ago Changed 44096b06348a
- 2mo ago First seen · 291 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A f15beea9eb7e
plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository MasonEgger/bpe-claude-code-plugin (7 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 3,792 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
engram-testing-coverage
TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
tdd
This skill should be used when the user wants to implement features or fix bugs using test-driven development. Enforces the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle with vertical slicing, context isolation between test writing and implementation, human checkpoints, and auto-test feedback loops. Uses multi-agent orchestration with the…
mobiai-mobile-tdd
You MUST use this before writing any implementation code for a mobile feature, bug fix, refactor, or behavior change. Tests come before implementation — no exceptions.
iterative-development
TDD iteration loops using Claude Code Stop hooks - runs tests after each response, feeds failures back automatically.