Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill --skill 17-mobile-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-SkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/masriyan/claude-code-cybersecurity-skill/17-mobile-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/masriyan/claude-code-cybersecurity-skill/17-mobile-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/masriyan/claude-code-cybersecurity-skill/17-mobile-security.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.02011 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01006 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00402 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00201 |
Grade A, and why
Mobile Application Security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mobile Application Security
Purpose
Enable Claude to assess Android and iOS application security against the OWASP MASVS (Mobile Application Security Verification Standard) and execute tests from the OWASP MASTG (Mobile Application Security Testing Guide). Claude performs static analysis on APK/IPA artifacts, guides dynamic instrumentation (Frida/objection), reviews secure storage, transport, and platform-interaction controls, and triages potentially malicious mobile apps.
Authorization Required: Only test applications you own or are explicitly authorized to assess. Decompiling and modifying third-party apps may violate licenses and law. Confirm written scope before proceeding.
Activation Triggers
This skill activates when the user asks about:
- Android (APK/AAB) or iOS (IPA) application security testing
- OWASP MASVS / MASTG verification or a mobile pentest checklist
- Decompiling, reversing, or static analysis of a mobile app
- Insecure data storage, hardcoded secrets, or keystore/keychain review
- Certificate pinning, SSL bypass, or mobile TLS/transport security
- Frida / objection dynamic instrumentation or runtime hooking
AndroidManifest.xml, exported components, deep links, orInfo.plistreview- Mobile malware analysis or suspicious APK triage
- Root/jailbreak detection, tampering, or anti-RE controls
Prerequisites
pip install requests pyaxmlparser
Optional enhanced capabilities:
apktool— APK decode/rebuildjadx— Dalvik → Java decompilerapkid— packer/obfuscator/compiler fingerprintingfrida/objection— dynamic instrumentationmobsf(MobSF) — automated static+dynamic analysis platform- Android SDK platform-tools (
adb),unzip,openssl
Core Capabilities
1. APK Static Analysis
When asked to analyze an APK:
- Unpack & decode —
apktool d app.apk; extractAndroidManifest.xml,classes*.dex,resources.arsc, native libs (lib/), and assets. - Manifest review — flag:
android:debuggable="true",android:allowBackup="true"- Exported components (
activity/service/receiver/providerwithexported="true"or implicit via intent-filter) lacking permissions usesCleartextTraffic="true"/ permissivenetwork_security_config- Dangerous/excessive permissions; custom permissions with weak
protectionLevel - Deep links /
android:autoVerify(app-link hijack), exportedContentProviderpaths
- Secret hunting — scan decompiled sources/resources/assets for API keys, tokens, private keys, cloud creds, hardcoded crypto keys/IVs, and backend URLs.
- Decompile —
jadxto Java; review auth, crypto, WebView (addJavascriptInterface,setJavaScriptEnabled,loadUrlwith untrusted input), and SQL. - Native & packing —
apkidfor packers/obfuscators; inspectlib/*/*.sofor JNI entry points and hardcoded data. - Signature — verify signing scheme (v1/v2/v3), debug-cert use, and integrity.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 173 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A ebc9f78d5488
Mobile Application Security is a skill published in the GitHub repository Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill (397 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 2,011 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Runtime iOS app security testing with Objection (Frida): inspect keychain and filesystem data, explore app internals at runtime, and validate/bypass client-side protections during authorized mobile assessments.
analyzing-android-malware-with-apktool
Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically…
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Use when performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting…
analyzing-android-malware-with-apktool
Use when perform static analysis of Android APK malware samples using apktool for decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for permission analysis, manifest inspection, and suspicious API call detection. Use when performing static analysis of android apk malware samples using apktool.
reverse-engineering-ios-app-with-frida
Reverse engineers iOS applications using Frida dynamic instrumentation to understand internal logic, extract encryption keys, bypass security controls, and discover hidden functionality without source code access. Use when performing authorized iOS penetration testing, analyzing proprietary protocols, understanding…
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting filesystem…