Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add matellez/claude-skills --skill martech-contract-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matellez/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matellez/claude-skills/martech-contract-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matellez/claude-skills/martech-contract-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matellez/claude-skills/martech-contract-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matellez/claude-skills/martech-contract-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matellez/claude-skills/martech-contract-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00131 | $0.01329 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00066 | $0.00665 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00266 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
martech-contract-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- martech-contract-auditor — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MarTech Contract Auditor: Vendor Renewal and Negotiation Prep
This skill runs when the user is preparing for a vendor renewal or renegotiation. Search the web for current pricing benchmarks before writing anything. Do not rely on training data for pricing information.
HOW TO SET UP THIS SKILL
This skill works out of the box. No personal data required. Optionally add your current stack and contract details to get more specific output.
Optional context to provide:
- Current vendor, contract value, and renewal date
- How many seats, contacts, or records you are paying for vs. using
- What you actually use vs. what came with the package
- Whether you have a competing vendor evaluation in progress
What This Skill Does
Most MarTech vendors price on the assumption that buyers do not know their leverage. This skill helps you find it. It walks through six areas where renewal leverage exists, produces a negotiation brief, and delivers specific ask language you can use in the renewal conversation.
Step 1: Search for Current Pricing Benchmarks
Before building the negotiation brief, search for:
- Vendor name + "pricing" + current year
- Vendor name + "discount" or "negotiation tips"
- Vendor name + alternatives or competitors (to establish walk-away options)
- G2 or Capterra reviews mentioning pricing or contract experience
- Any recent funding, acquisition, or financial news about the vendor (financially pressured vendors discount more aggressively)
Note what you find. If pricing is not publicly available, note that and flag it as a negotiation signal: opacity in pricing means more room to negotiate.
Step 2: Build the Leverage Audit
Go through each category below and assess the user's position.
Usage vs. spend Is the user paying for capacity they are not using? Seats, contacts, records, API calls, or features that went unused last cycle are the strongest leverage point in any renewal. If usage is below 70% of contracted capacity, that is an opening.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 166 lines · 131 tokens per session scan A 79839c47a267
martech-contract-auditor is a skill published in the GitHub repository matellez/claude-skills (4 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 131 tokens to every session and 1,329 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
igce-builder-cr
Trigger for: cost-reimbursement IGCE, CR cost estimate, CPFF, CPAF, CPIF, cost-plus estimate, BAA estimate, fixed-fee analysis, award-fee analysis, incentive-fee analysis, proposed CR rate validation, cost-pool buildup, share-ratio scenario, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable…
acquisition-policy-workflow
Trigger for: explaining current FAR, DFARS, or agency-supplement text; determining documented acquisition-policy status for an agency and FAR part; comparing codified text, RFO model text, and agency deviations; tracing acquisition rulemaking; finding procurement comment periods; analyzing public comments; refreshing…
ot-project-description-builder
Trigger for: OT project description, OTA scope, Research OT under 10 U.S.C. 4021, Prototype OT under 10 U.S.C. 4022, follow-on production scope under 10 U.S.C. 4022(f), milestone-based project scope, prototype objective, phase or go/no-go structure, BAA white-paper conversion, SOO conversion, transition planning, or…
sow-pws-builder
Trigger for: writing, revising, converting, or descoping a federal Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, SOW, PWS, or SOO; develop executable requirements; define contract scope; create measurable performance standards; or prepare requirements before an IGCE. Produce a contract-file-ready .docx plus separate…
compliance-audit
Audits codebases against compliance frameworks (SOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, ISO27001, etc.) using parallel agents per subdirectory/sub-repo. Produces a detailed markdown report with line-level code references. Use when you need to check a directory or monorepo for compliance violations before an audit or review.
grc-messaging-guardrails
Validates compliance, security, and GRC terminology in marketing copy. Enforces accurate claims, prevents common mistakes (e.g., calling SOC 2 a "certification"), and applies risk-first narrative framing for B2B SaaS audiences. Use when writing or reviewing any marketing content that references compliance frameworks…