vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs

vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs is a skill for Claude Code from mracal/vibe-engineering. It costs 42 tokens per session (695 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of audit, MIT.

A procedure for creating fuzz tests, which repeatedly feed unexpected data to parsers to find crashes and other failures.

In plain words
What is it for?
Adding Go fuzz-test scaffolding, seeding it with existing fixtures and unusual inputs, and checking that parsing does not panic.
Why use it?
It exposes weaknesses that ordinary examples may miss when software reads YAML, JSON, configuration files, webhooks, or other external input.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

Good fit Adding Go fuzz-test scaffolding, seeding it with existing fixtures and unusual inputs, and checking that parsing does not panic.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/fuzz-parser-inputs
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mracal/vibe-engineering --skill fuzz-parser-inputs
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mracal/vibe-engineering

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/fuzz-parser-inputs/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/fuzz-parser-inputs)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/fuzz-parser-inputs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/fuzz-parser-inputs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/fuzz-parser-inputs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mracal/vibe-engineering/fuzz-parser-inputs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 42 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 695 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 86% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00042 $0.00695
Opus 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00278
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00139
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00069

Measured 1mo ago against content hash ca7b2689204c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

86% identical to audit — 101 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/fuzz-parser-inputs/SKILL.md · 97 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs

Every parser will eventually see input you didn't expect. Fuzz testing finds the crashes before production does.

When to Use This Skill

  • Implementing any parser (YAML, JSON, XML, config, DSL)
  • Processing user-supplied input
  • Handling webhook payloads or API responses
  • Parsing file formats

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • The parser is a well-tested standard library (e.g., encoding/json)
  • You're only reading known, controlled input
  • The parser is trivial (e.g., splitting a string by comma)

Steps

Go Fuzz Tests

  1. Create fuzz test file (parser_fuzz_test.go):

    func FuzzParseConfig(f *testing.F) {
        // Seed corpus from existing test fixtures
        files, _ := filepath.Glob("testdata/*.yaml")
        for _, file := range files {
            data, _ := os.ReadFile(file)
            f.Add(data)
        }
    
        // Add targeted seeds
        f.Add([]byte(""))           // empty
        f.Add([]byte("{}"))         // minimal valid
        f.Add([]byte("\x00\x00"))   // binary
    
        f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, data []byte) {
            // Should never panic
            result, err := ParseConfig(data)
            if err != nil {
                return // errors are fine
            }
            // If no error, result should be valid
            if result.Name == "" {
                t.Error("parsed successfully but Name is empty")
            }
        })
    }
    
  2. Seed the corpus from:

    • Existing test fixtures
    • Real production examples
    • Known edge cases
    • Minimally valid inputs
    • Binary/garbage data
  3. Run initial fuzz:

    go test -fuzz=FuzzParseConfig -fuzztime=30s
    
  4. Record results:

    • Crashes found
    • New corpus entries generated
    • Edge cases discovered
  5. Fix crashes -- Every panic or unexpected behavior becomes a permanent test case

Other Languages

  • JavaScript/TypeScript: Use jest-fuzz or fast-check property-based testing
  • Python: Use hypothesis for property-based testing
  • Rust: Use cargo-fuzz with libfuzzer

Read the full file on GitHub · 97 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 97 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A ca7b2689204c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs is a skill published in the GitHub repository mracal/vibe-engineering (3 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 695 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to audit, differing in 101 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

evidence-first-debugging

Use when debugging a crash, lỗi, failing game, tool, build, service, script, or reproducible local code failure requires repro or reproduction, giả thuyết or ranked hypotheses, instrumentation, root-cause isolation, a minimal fix, regression proof, and a regression test.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 63 tokens

load-soak-capacity-verification

Use when servers or online game services need controlled load, soak, concurrency, capacity, saturation, leak, queue, failover, recovery, and scaling verification with baselines and stop conditions; not for client frame budgets.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 52 tokens

platform-device-compatibility-matrix

Use when a game needs a platform and device compatibility matrix across OS, hardware, GPU, memory, resolution, input, network, storefront, certification, test evidence, and support policy; not for store metadata preparation.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 51 tokens

qa-test-strategy-and-coverage

Use when a game project, milestone, or feature needs a QA test strategy and coverage matrix across risk, test levels, platforms, environments, ownership, automation, regression, evidence, and exit criteria; not for one playtest session.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 55 tokens

build-and-runtime-verification

Use when running build, compile, test, launch, or runtime checks and producing a verdict tied to exact commands, exit codes, artifact paths, limitations, and fresh evidence.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 41 tokens

playtest-evidence

Use when planning or reviewing game playtests that need structured scenarios, participant context, observations, reproduction evidence, severity, and honest separation of observed findings from conclusions.

hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT · 37 tokens