Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill aris-auto-paper-improvement-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OpenLAIR/dr-clawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openlair/dr-claw/aris-auto-paper-improvement-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openlair/dr-claw/aris-auto-paper-improvement-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openlair/dr-claw/aris-auto-paper-improvement-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openlair/dr-claw/aris-auto-paper-improvement-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openlair/dr-claw/aris-auto-paper-improvement-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 305 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.03137 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01569 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00627 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00314 |
Grade A, and why
aris-auto-paper-improvement-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 327 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A f7e1002e36b0
aris-auto-paper-improvement-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository OpenLAIR/dr-claw (1,091 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 3,137 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
proof-checker
A rigorous proof-checking and repair skill for LaTeX mathematics. LaTeX is a text format commonly used to write mathematical documents.
paper-illustration
A tool for creating academic-paper illustrations such as architecture diagrams and method figures with Gemini image generation and Claude-guided revisions.
paper-navigator
Find and read academic papers: disambiguate queries, discover papers (search, citation traversal, recommendations, arXiv monitoring, trending, GitHub search), evaluate (TLDR, citations, code, SOTA), and read with structured analysis (3-level strategy). Use when: finding papers, reading a paper, related work, citation…
paper-write
A section-by-section LaTeX drafting workflow based on a paper outline. LaTeX is a text-based system commonly used to format academic papers.
evo-memory
Manages persistent research memory across ideation and experimentation cycles. Maintains two stores: Ideation Memory MI (feasible/unsuccessful directions) and Experimentation Memory ME (reusable strategies for data processing, model training, architecture, debugging). Three evolution mechanisms: IDE (after…
experiment-pipeline
Guides structured 4-stage experiment execution with attempt budgets and gate conditions: Stage 1 initial implementation (reproduce baseline), Stage 2 hyperparameter tuning, Stage 3 proposed method validation, Stage 4 ablation study. Integrates with evo-memory (load prior strategies, trigger IVE/ESE) and…