lightspeed-agentic-operator: Skill for Cursor

.cursor/skills/go-testing-code-review/SKILL.md

go-testing-code-review is a skill for Cursor from openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator. It costs 29 tokens per session (1,299 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A Go test-code review guide for test structure, assertions, mocks, and coverage. Table-driven tests run the same test logic against several named input cases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing Go test files to check naming, table-driven structure, subtests, cleanup, parallel safety, mocks, assertions, and coverage.
Why use it?
It helps reveal tests that are unclear, poorly isolated, or missing edge cases and error paths.

Skill for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/.

This is openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator's own configuration. It tells Cursor how to work on lightspeed-agentic-operator itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything lightspeed-agentic-operator configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/main/.cursor/skills/go-testing-code-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for go-testing-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/go-testing-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/go-testing-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/go-testing-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/go-testing-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for go-testing-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/go-testing-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/go-testing-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 29 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,299 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00029 $0.01299
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00520
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00260
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00130

Measured 1mo ago against content hash ee7e430a4fcc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

go-testing-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/skills/go-testing-code-review/SKILL.md · 201 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Go Testing Code Review

This codebase primarily uses the standard testing package (not Ginkgo) for controller and CLI tests; keep the Ginkgo/envtest bullets for when they apply or for cross-repo consistency.

Quick Reference

Issue Type Reference
Test structure, naming references/structure.md
Mocking, interfaces references/mocking.md

Review Checklist

File Organization

  • Test file naming: All test files follow *_test.go convention (e.g., reconciler_test.go for reconciler.go)
  • Co-location: Unit tests are in the same package as the code they test

Standard Go Testing

  • Tests are table-driven with clear case names
  • Subtests use t.Run for parallel execution
  • Test names describe behavior, not implementation
  • Errors include got/want with descriptive message
  • Cleanup registered with t.Cleanup
  • Parallel tests don't share mutable state
  • Mocks use interfaces defined in test file
  • Coverage includes edge cases and error paths

Ginkgo/Gomega (BDD Framework)

  • Use Describe for test suites, Context for scenarios, It for test cases
  • Setup/teardown in BeforeEach/AfterEach for proper isolation
  • Assertions use Expect() with matchers (To(), NotTo())
  • Complex nested contexts organized logically (not too flat, not too deep)
  • Use By() for multi-step test documentation

Kubernetes/Controller Testing

  • Controller tests use envtest for realistic API server testing
  • Test fixtures cleaned up properly (remove finalizers before deletion)
  • Owner references validated on created resources
  • Reconciliation loops tested with eventual consistency (Eventually())
  • Both success and error paths tested for each reconcile function

Critical Patterns

Table-Driven Tests

// BAD - repetitive
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
    if Add(1, 2) != 3 {
        t.Error("wrong")
    }
    if Add(0, 0) != 0 {
        t.Error("wrong")
    }
}

// GOOD
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name     string
        a, b     int
        want     int
    }{
        {"positive numbers", 1, 2, 3},
        {"zeros", 0, 0, 0},
        {"negative", -1, 1, 0},
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got := Add(tt.a, tt.b)
            if got != tt.want {
                t.Errorf("Add(%d, %d) = %d, want %d", tt.a, tt.b, got, tt.want)
            }
        })
    }
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 201 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 201 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A ee7e430a4fcc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

go-testing-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator (15 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,299 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.