Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/main/.cursor/skills/go-testing-code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/go-testing-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/go-testing-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/go-testing-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/go-testing-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator/go-testing-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01299 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00520 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00260 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
go-testing-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Testing Code Review
This codebase primarily uses the standard testing package (not Ginkgo) for controller and CLI tests; keep the Ginkgo/envtest bullets for when they apply or for cross-repo consistency.
Quick Reference
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| Test structure, naming | references/structure.md |
| Mocking, interfaces | references/mocking.md |
Review Checklist
File Organization
- Test file naming: All test files follow
*_test.goconvention (e.g.,reconciler_test.goforreconciler.go) - Co-location: Unit tests are in the same package as the code they test
Standard Go Testing
- Tests are table-driven with clear case names
- Subtests use t.Run for parallel execution
- Test names describe behavior, not implementation
- Errors include got/want with descriptive message
- Cleanup registered with t.Cleanup
- Parallel tests don't share mutable state
- Mocks use interfaces defined in test file
- Coverage includes edge cases and error paths
Ginkgo/Gomega (BDD Framework)
- Use
Describefor test suites,Contextfor scenarios,Itfor test cases - Setup/teardown in
BeforeEach/AfterEachfor proper isolation - Assertions use
Expect()with matchers (To(),NotTo()) - Complex nested contexts organized logically (not too flat, not too deep)
- Use
By()for multi-step test documentation
Kubernetes/Controller Testing
- Controller tests use
envtestfor realistic API server testing - Test fixtures cleaned up properly (remove finalizers before deletion)
- Owner references validated on created resources
- Reconciliation loops tested with eventual consistency (
Eventually()) - Both success and error paths tested for each reconcile function
Critical Patterns
Table-Driven Tests
// BAD - repetitive
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
if Add(1, 2) != 3 {
t.Error("wrong")
}
if Add(0, 0) != 0 {
t.Error("wrong")
}
}
// GOOD
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
a, b int
want int
}{
{"positive numbers", 1, 2, 3},
{"zeros", 0, 0, 0},
{"negative", -1, 1, 0},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := Add(tt.a, tt.b)
if got != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Add(%d, %d) = %d, want %d", tt.a, tt.b, got, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 201 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A ee7e430a4fcc
go-testing-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository openshift/lightspeed-agentic-operator (15 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,299 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-review
You are an expert DataHub test reviewer. Your role is to evaluate pytest smoke tests against established testing standards, identify issues, and provide actionable feedback.
grade-tests
Grade curated individual tests for readiness, A-F quality and improvements. ALWAYS USE FOR: grade tests, review only a named test, per-test readiness or quality bands for supplied methods, bodies, file spans or bounded PR diffs, including existing tests. Return Pass/Failed/Uncertain/Not applicable; unresolved/empty…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
brooks-test
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow…
dart-mechanical-refactor
DART Mechanical Refactor: perform a behavior-preserving mechanical refactor.
refactor
Refactors code for quality and maintainability. Triggers: refactor, clean up, restructure, improve code, modernize.