Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Oscaner/skills --skill cdd-devgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Oscaner/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oscaner/skills/cdd-dev)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oscaner/skills/cdd-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oscaner/skills/cdd-dev/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oscaner/skills/cdd-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oscaner/skills/cdd-dev.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.01911 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00764 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00382 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00191 |
Grade A, and why
cdd-dev scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Kairos CDD-Dev
Executes planned tasks through the engine's implement / review / fix chain — its own orchestrator decisions (mode chain, final review) following the engine's next: line, with no installed-engine precondition (npx pulls the engine on demand); on closure the engine's next: face carries the pipeline continuation.
Invocation discipline — every engine command runs via npx -y @oscaner-skills/cdd-engine@latest <subcommand> as a background dispatch: launch it in the background and await the completion notification — never poll — then read the full output (stdout/stderr). Output filtering is forbidden — no piping to tail/head, no 2>&1 |, no EXIT=$? capture. Round rhythm — one review pass per dispatch; a fix round re-enters the review while the route is not done; the implement child commits its own work; ensure the working tree is clean before entering review (dirty → BLOCKED); the orchestrator writes no tree during dispatch. Failure face — cross-node failure handling lives in the Failure Modes table below (the single source); node Fail entries keep only local behavior.
Flow Digraph
flowchart TD
A[determine-base] --> B[set-base]
B --> C[implement-wave]
C --> L[NEXT-LOOP]
L -->|until next is terminal| L
L -->|no next| Z1((BLOCKED))
Node Definitions
determine-base
- Do: Resolve the base branch — inference sources in order: plan
basefield → branch upstream (git rev-parse --abbrev-ref @{u}) → conversation context; if none yields a definitive base, ask the user — do not guess. The base may already be present in the artifact (npx -y @oscaner-skills/cdd-engine@latest base get --plan <path>); skip inference when the artifact is present. - Read: plan document + git upstream + conversation context +
npx -y @oscaner-skills/cdd-engine@latest base get --plan <path> - Exit: base resolved →
set-base - Fail: user refuses to confirm → BLOCKED: base-undecided
set-base
- Do: Persist the base via the engine CLI —
npx -y @oscaner-skills/cdd-engine@latest base set --plan <path> --base <branch> --source <enum>, wheresourceisplan-field|branch-upstream|conversation-context|user-confirmed. The engine is the sole write/read path for the artifact — never hand-write it;setis idempotent, refusals and validation errors are engine-handled. - Read:
npx -y @oscaner-skills/cdd-engine@latest base get --plan <path>(the artifact on stdout) - Exit: artifact written (or already present) →
implement-wave - Fail: engine refusal / validation error → report to user; user decides (no hand-written artifact)
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 78 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2a277e1d74f0
cdd-dev is a skill published in the GitHub repository Oscaner/skills (64 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 1,911 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-17.
Other skills, from other repositories
api-design-reviewer
Review REST API designs for quality, consistency, and breaking changes. Lints OpenAPI specs, generates scorecards, and detects breaking changes between versions. Use when designing APIs, reviewing contracts, or managing API versioning.
code-reviewer
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, and Kotlin. Analyzes PRs for complexity, risk, SOLID violations, and code smells. Use when reviewing PRs, analyzing code quality, or generating review checklists.
pr-review-expert
Systematic PR review with blast-radius analysis, security scanning, and breaking-change and test-coverage deltas. Use when reviewing PRs that touch shared libraries, APIs, database schemas, auth, or security-sensitive code.
apple-polish
Design and keynote-readiness craftsmanship review of an iOS app. Evaluates through Jony Ive (visual obsession) and Steve Jobs (demo readiness) perspectives, presents prioritized findings, then orchestrates parallel agents to fix selected issues and push a TestFlight build. Use for design polish, not engineering bugs.
apple-patterns-check
Validate iOS code against Apple's best practices. Run during /ship, before commits, or when reviewing code for Apple-specific compliance. Triggers on "check patterns", "apple check", "pre-commit check", or "validate swift code".
architecture-fit-check
Audit a design or subsystem for primitive/problem fit — catch the wrong-primitive trap where a powerful or opaque Apple framework (CloudKit sharing/CKShare, NSPersistentCloudKitContainer mirroring, NSFileCoordinator, App Intents graphs, widget timelines) is adopted to enforce an elegant invariant instead of fitting…