Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add proyecto26/autoresearch-ai-plugin --skill autoresearch-mlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/proyecto26/autoresearch-ai-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/proyecto26/autoresearch-ai-plugin/autoresearch-ml)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proyecto26/autoresearch-ai-plugin/autoresearch-ml"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proyecto26/autoresearch-ai-plugin/autoresearch-ml/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proyecto26/autoresearch-ai-plugin/autoresearch-ml"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proyecto26/autoresearch-ai-plugin/autoresearch-ml.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00212 | $0.04984 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00106 | $0.02492 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00997 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00498 |
Grade A, and why
autoresearch-ml scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 337 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Autoresearch ML: Autonomous LLM Training Optimization
An autonomous experiment loop for single-GPU LLM pretraining. Edit train.py → commit → run 5-minute training → measure val_bpb → keep improvement or revert → repeat forever.
This skill is self-contained — it includes everything needed to set up and run the loop.
Setup Phase
1. Copy Template Assets
Copy the bundled training template to the project directory:
cp ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/assets/prepare.py .
cp ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/assets/train.py .
cp ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/assets/pyproject.toml .
cp ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/assets/program.md .
2. Install and Prepare
uv sync # Install dependencies
uv run prepare.py # Download data shards, train tokenizer (~2 min)
3. Verify GPU
nvidia-smi
python -c "import torch; print(f'CUDA: {torch.cuda.is_available()}, Device: {torch.cuda.get_device_name()}, VRAM: {torch.cuda.get_device_properties(0).total_mem / 1e9:.1f} GB')"
4. Initialize the Experiment Session
- Create a branch:
git checkout -b autoresearch/<tag>-<date>— use$ARGUMENTSas the run tag if provided, otherwise propose one based on today's date - Gitignore the living session files — critical:
git revertfails ifautoresearch.jsonlis tracked, and ifautoresearch.md(which you update mid-loop) is tracked, a revert can erase your learnings:printf '%s\n' autoresearch.jsonl autoresearch.md autoresearch.ideas.md run.log >> .gitignore git add .gitignore && git commit -m "autoresearch: add session files to gitignore" - Read
prepare.pyandtrain.pythoroughly to understand the codebase - Write
autoresearch.md— a living session document recording goal, metrics, files in scope, constraints, and learnings. It is gitignored (living state), never committed or reverted. - Write
autoresearch.sh— the benchmark script (see Benchmark Script section below) - Commit only
autoresearch.sh(the immutable benchmark harness) — notautoresearch.md/.jsonl(gitignored above).train.pystays in history as normal. - Run baseline:
bash autoresearch.sh - Parse metrics from output (lines matching
METRIC name=value) - Record baseline in
autoresearch.jsonl:- First write a config header:
{"type":"config","name":"Optimize val_bpb","metricName":"val_bpb","metricUnit":"bpb","bestDirection":"lower"} - Then a status marker:
{"type":"status","state":"running","timestamp":...} - Then record the baseline result
- First write a config header:
- Begin the experiment loop
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 337 lines · 212 tokens per session scan A ff2c482d3a5a
autoresearch-ml is a skill published in the GitHub repository proyecto26/autoresearch-ai-plugin (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 212 tokens to every session and 4,984 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Gene Panel Selection Workflow
End-to-end workflow for gene panel design in scRNA-seq and spatial transcriptomics, that should be STRICTLY followed: dataset understanding + smart downsampling + train/test splits, algorithmic selection (HVG/DE/RF/scGeneFit/SpaPROS), optimal sub-panel discovery (ARI vs size), biological completion with a stability…
arbor-agent-orchestrator
Top-level controller for recreating the open-source AutoResearch workflow as a suite of skills. Use when the user asks to run, emulate, extract, validate, or refine Arbor/AutoResearch behavior, especially when a coordinator must load phase skills for setup, ideation, executors, merge evaluation, novelty search…
finetuning
This skill should be used when picking or diagnosing a training move (SFT, LoRA, DPO/KTO/ORPO, RFT, GRPO/PPO/RLOO, RLHF), or when the user mentions fine-tuning, post-training, training recipe, reward design, or weight updates. Decision tree by reward shape, smoke-run gate, three failure diagnostics, five…
template-autoresearch-project
AutoResearch loop exemplar — deterministic ML candidate evaluation, evidence registries, claim ledgers, artifact manifests, readiness gates.
ml-autoresearch
Use when the user wants an autonomous ML research loop that does more than blindly try changes. After every training run the agent analyses what actually happened inside the model — gradients, activations, embeddings, errors, data — and grounds the next change in that evidence. A on/off dial adds scientific-literature…
exploratory-autoresearch
Use when the user wants an autonomous ML research loop that explores the space broadly rather than hill-climbing one approach. A temperature scheduler replaces the usual hypothesis step: it forces several wild, diverse swings (full rewrites, different architectures/regimes) early, then enters an adaptive phase that…