Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow --skill critical-paper-readinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow/critical-paper-reading)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow/critical-paper-reading"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow/critical-paper-reading/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow/critical-paper-reading"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow/critical-paper-reading.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00191 | $0.02894 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00076 | $0.01158 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00579 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00289 |
Grade A, and why
critical-paper-reading scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +191 tokens per session e604454cbdaf
- 3d ago Changed · +1 lines f675f273ad97
- 4d ago Changed 9b070990b3e9
- 8d ago Changed · +1 lines 24b13cca92a4
- 1mo ago First seen · 212 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 01efad330359
critical-paper-reading is a skill published in the GitHub repository qiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow (9 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 191 tokens to every session and 2,894 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
self-review
Use when checking your own manuscript before submission from a reviewer's perspective. Returns anticipated Major/Minor comments with fixes, including numerical, citation and leakage checks, with an optional multi-reviewer panel. Someone else's paper is /peer-review.
check-reporting
Use when auditing a manuscript item by item against a reporting guideline or risk-of-bias tool. Covers 49 reporting guidelines and risk-of-bias tools (STROBE, CONSORT, STARD, TRIPOD+AI, PRISMA, QUADAS and more), marking each item PRESENT, PARTIAL or MISSING. Not a reviewer critique (/self-review).
meta-analysis
Use when running a systematic review and meta-analysis, DTA or intervention. Covers PROSPERO protocol, search, screening, extraction, risk of bias (QUADAS-3, RoB 2, ROBINS-I), bivariate/HSROC or random-effects pooling, forest plots, heterogeneity and PRISMA reporting. Topic scouting is /ma-scout.
present-paper
Use when preparing an academic talk such as a journal club, grand rounds, seminar, conference presentation, or lecture/teaching deck. Analyzes the source, drafts audience-adapted speaker scripts, builds or augments the PPTX with speaker notes and prepares Q&A.
sync-submission
Use when building, auditing or freezing a journal submission package from the canonical manuscript. Detects drift between the source and the per-journal submission copy, builds byte-preserving packages with manifests, and records current, stale or frozen status.
write-paper
Use when drafting a medical research manuscript or any IMRAD section. Runs an 8-phase pipeline from outline to submission-ready draft for original articles, AI validation studies, case reports, meta-analyses, technical notes and more. Checking a draft is /self-review.