tia-review

tia-review is a skill for Claude Code from renanlido/tia-harness. It costs 190 tokens per session (4,681 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only checker for existing Siemens TIA Portal projects, which are industrial controller programs. It compares the project with rules for data types, naming, program structure, memory access, and other engineering practices.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps audit an open TIA project, identify deviations from the engineering baseline, and review how its controller code is organized.
Why use it?
It finds design and architecture problems without changing the project.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Part of the tia-harness plugin — 9 skills, 4 agents, 1 hook shipped together

Good fit It helps audit an open TIA project, identify deviations from the engineering baseline, and review how its controller code is organized.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/renanlido/tia-harness/tia-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add renanlido/tia-harness --skill tia-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/renanlido/tia-harness

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install tia-harness, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 9 skills, 4 agents, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for tia-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/renanlido/tia-harness/tia-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/renanlido/tia-harness/tia-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/renanlido/tia-harness/tia-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/renanlido/tia-harness/tia-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for tia-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/renanlido/tia-harness/tia-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/renanlido/tia-harness/tia-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 190 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,681 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00190 $0.04681
Opus 5.5 $0.00076 $0.01872
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00038 $0.00936
Haiku 4.5 $0.00019 $0.00468

Measured 7d ago against content hash 9c4f67ed1dde, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

tia-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

codex/skills/tia-review/SKILL.md · 225 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 225 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

tia-review — audit an existing project vs the baseline (class R, read-only)

Audit a connected TIA project against the non-negotiable baseline (TIA best-practices §0) and the naming/architecture rules (§4/§5/§8). It is a read-only review: it enumerates the project model through the tia MCP read tools and reports deviations — it never changes anything.

Besides the baseline findings it reports, as information only, the objects of each CLP that nothing references (unused-object candidates, from the cross-references): a separate Unused objects section, never a baseline rule.

Errors and reporting

  • First call tia_ping: continue only if it reports reachable:true and activated:true. activated:null with a busy detail means a job is still running: poll tia_job_status with the jobId you hold, or wait and ping again. Otherwise stop, quote its detail and hint verbatim and say that nothing was changed (prerequisites: tia_guide {"topic":"gotchas"}).
  • If no tia_* tool is available, the tia MCP is not connected: say so and stop. Never continue from memory and never work around it with hand-made HTTP calls (they bypass the MCP's gate checks).
  • On a tool error (isError:true), quote its error and kind verbatim, relay its hint, and state what was done and what was not. Apply only the remedy the hint or this skill names, at most once; otherwise stop and ask.
  • Never report success after an error, never retry a refused call with changed arguments, and never cross a human gate: relay a requires_human_action answer verbatim and wait for the human.
  • status:"running" or kind:"busy" is not a failure: poll tia_job_status {jobId}. After a timeout, check the state before repeating anything.
  • This skill names these remedies for tia_crossrefs (step 5): a 409 crossrefs_unavailable answer (quote its error, kind and hint, report the Unused objects section as not done, and finish the rest of the review); a 409 cursor_stale answer, or coverage counts that differ between pages (restart the page walk from the first page, once for each); and a page that arrives with an omission marker (repeat that page with a smaller limit, at most three times). Every other tool error stops the review as above.
  • For the status:"running" and kind:"busy" answers of tia_crossrefs, step 5 says which job to poll and what to do next; the bullet above applies to every other call.

Read the full file on GitHub · 225 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago Changed · +133 lines · +15 tokens per session 9c4f67ed1dde
  2. 10d ago First seen · 92 lines · 175 tokens per session scan A cf306fe17fbd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

tia-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository renanlido/tia-harness (11 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 190 tokens to every session and 4,681 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-18.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories