Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vibeic/vibe-icnpx agentmods add skills/vibeic/vibe-ic/rtl-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibeic/vibe-ic/rtl-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibeic/vibe-ic/rtl-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vibeic/vibe-ic/rtl-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibeic/vibe-ic/rtl-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vibeic/vibe-ic/rtl-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.03123 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.01249 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00625 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00312 |
Grade A, and why
rtl-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 241 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RTL Review (Pattern-A — program-driven, doctrine-compliant v0.1.50)
Doctrine (user, 2026-05-29): 把修法寫進工具，而非寫進 prompt。
The 6-category checklist + 0-10 scoring rubric that previously lived in this skill prose is now in
programs/rtl_review_aggregate.py(54 pytest cases pin every category mapping + scoring boundary, and pin that an unreadable producer is REFUSED rather than scored as clean).You run the program first. Claude is the backstop for residual prose, NOT the rule applicator.
When to use
User shares an RTL file or directory and asks for a review.
Mandatory: run the program FIRST
python3 plugins/vibe-ic/programs/rtl_review_aggregate.py \
--rtl-dir <dir-of-.v-and-.sv> \
--top <selected-top> \
--define <selected-compile-define> \
--tmp-dir <project-root>/reports/phase2/lint/rtl_review \
--out-md <project-root>/reports/phase2/lint/rtl_review.md \
--out-json <project-root>/reports/phase2/lint/rtl_review.json
Child reports and native elaboration evidence belong outside the complete RTL
source inventory. Without --tmp-dir, canonical <project>/phase2/stage1/rtl
uses <project>/reports/phase2/lint/rtl_review; a standalone RTL directory uses
its sibling <rtl-dir>.review. An explicit --tmp-dir remains honored.
Existing <rtl-dir>/.review evidence is left unchanged. It remains extra
inventory until explicitly archived outside RTL; do not ignore hidden files or
delete reports to obtain admission. Any approved relocation must preserve the
original bytes, hashes and receipts in that archive before moving the files.
Pass the frontend's selected top and complete ordered RTL closure (repeat
--rtl-file when the directory also contains testbenches or include hubs),
compile defines (--define), integer top overrides (--parameter) and include
directories (--include-dir). Omit --define for an explicitly empty define
set. These describe the selected configuration; AI does not guess active
generate branches. The hygiene consumer elaborates fresh native Yosys evidence
in this invocation and retains its input hashes, log and JSON in a new
native-elaboration-* directory. Without a selected top, review remains
lexical and conditional-driver uncertainty still blocks. Native failure does
not erase findings or the missing-auditor disclosure.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +4 lines 1fa6977c5ba9
- 6d ago Changed · +32 lines b1476f88e5f0
- 13d ago Changed · +12 lines b623c2f6b559
- 14d ago Changed · +18 lines c4132905ad7f
- 25d ago Changed · +19 lines 90b601b245b4
- 1mo ago Changed · +13 lines e606f619b809
- 1mo ago First seen · 143 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A c16530a8d35d
rtl-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository vibeic/vibe-ic (28 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 3,123 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
analog-review
Cross-model circuit design review with divergence analysis. Sends netlist and rationale to multiple external LLMs for independent audit. Supports minimax-m2.7, qwen-3.6-plus, kimi-k2.5, glm-5.1. Use after analog-design to get independent review before simulation.
kicad-pcb-review
Use this skill when reviewing, fixing, validating, or preparing KiCad PCB projects with the kicad MCP server.
kicad-pcb-review
KiCad PCB review and manufacturing readiness agent skill for Cursor.
altium-schematic-review
Review an Altium schematic (.SchDoc) — find unconnected pins, missing footprint links and net errors, then judge each candidate against the datasheet before calling it a defect. Triggers: "review this schematic", "check my circuit", "ERC", "floating pins", "unconnected", "any missing footprints", "does this schematic…
analog-netlist-crawl
Crawl and analyze post-layout parasitic netlists without running SPICE. Answers "what's the effective resistance from node A to node B across this massive R mesh?", "inside the VREFN mesh, which device pins are electrically farthest apart?", "which nets have the worst coupling?", "where does settling bottleneck?" — by…
analog-verify
Pre-simulation review and Spectre simulation verification for analog circuits. Reviews circuit netlist and testbench, runs simulation, produces margin report. Use after analog-design completes a netlist.