Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ronmkr/promptbook/hook-developmentnpx skills add ronmkr/PromptBook --skill hook-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ronmkr/PromptBookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/hook-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/hook-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/hook-development.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00118 | $0.03997 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.01998 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00799 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00400 |
Grade A, and why
hook-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to hook-development — 80 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 713 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hook Development for Antigravity Plugins
Overview
Hooks are event-driven automation scripts that execute in response to Antigravity events. Use hooks to validate operations, enforce policies, add context, and integrate external tools into workflows.
Key capabilities:
- Validate tool calls before execution (PreToolUse)
- React to tool results (PostToolUse)
- Enforce completion standards (Stop, SubagentStop)
- Load project context (SessionStart)
- Automate workflows across the development lifecycle
Hook Types
Prompt-Based Hooks (Recommended)
Use LLM-driven decision making for context-aware validation:
{
"type": "prompt",
"prompt": "Evaluate if this tool use is appropriate: $TOOL_INPUT",
"timeout": 30
}
Supported events: Stop, SubagentStop, UserPromptSubmit, PreToolUse
Benefits:
- Context-aware decisions based on natural language reasoning
- Flexible evaluation logic without bash scripting
- Better edge case handling
- Easier to maintain and extend
Command Hooks
Execute bash commands for deterministic checks:
{
"type": "command",
"command": "bash ${GEMINI_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/validate.sh",
"timeout": 60
}
Use for:
- Fast deterministic validations
- File system operations
- External tool integrations
- Performance-critical checks
Hook Configuration Formats
Plugin hooks.json Format
For plugin hooks in hooks/hooks.json, use wrapper format:
{
"description": "Brief explanation of hooks (optional)",
"hooks": {
"PreToolUse": [...],
"Stop": [...],
"SessionStart": [...]
}
}
Key points:
descriptionfield is optionalhooksfield is required wrapper containing actual hook events- This is the plugin-specific format
Example:
{
"description": "Validation hooks for code quality",
"hooks": {
"PreToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Write",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "${GEMINI_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/validate.sh"
}
]
}
]
}
}
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/load-context.sh 1.7 KB runs code
- examples/validate-bash.sh 1.3 KB runs code
- examples/validate-write.sh 1.2 KB runs code
- references/advanced.md 9.9 KB
- references/migration.md 8.1 KB
- references/patterns.md 7.0 KB
- scripts/hook-linter.sh 4.1 KB runs code
- scripts/README.md 3.6 KB
- scripts/test-hook.sh 5.2 KB runs code
- scripts/validate-hook-schema.sh 5.0 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 713 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A 606517051808
hook-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository ronmkr/PromptBook (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 3,997 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to hook-development, differing in 80 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing
Testing workflow and quality standards for writing and running tests. Use when: (1) Writing new tests, (2) Adding a new feature that needs tests, (3) Modifying logic that has existing tests, (4) Before claiming a task is complete.
bug-audit
Weekly multi-agent audit for serious bugs (data integrity, silent caps, staleness, timestamp math, trust boundaries). Fans out Sonnet scanners + Opus deep auditors, adversarially verifies every finding, files GitHub issues for confirmed critical/high bugs. Trigger: /bug-audit.
multi-llm-review
Run complete, evidence-backed code reviews through the local stdio gateway across the seven canonical CLI providers: Claude, Codex, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, Devin, and Cursor. Use for quality, security, correctness, or release validation that requires independent reviewers.
secure-orchestration
Orchestrate security-sensitive LLM work with the gateway's Claude-managed approval boundary, provider-native legacy controls, evidence-aware auditing, and complete no-limit review handling.
provider-codex
Track and maintain the upstream OpenAI Codex CLI contract. Use when OpenAI ships a Codex release, when a codex exec flag/sandbox/approval/resume/subcommand behaviour changes, or when an upstream scan flags drift. Process guidance only; src/upstream-contracts.ts is the mechanical source of truth.
retrospective-walk
Walk a human or agent through a diff, worktree, commit range, gateway job, or episode reference as a structured retrospective. Use after implement-review-fix or multi-LLM review cycles, when reviewing prior jobs or uncommitted work, or when durable evidence is needed for what changed, why it changed, who/when…