Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add samibs/skillfoundry --skill accessibilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/samibs/skillfoundryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/samibs/skillfoundry/accessibility)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samibs/skillfoundry/accessibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samibs/skillfoundry/accessibility/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/samibs/skillfoundry/accessibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/samibs/skillfoundry/accessibility.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 278 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- high Prompt Injection · line 412 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00005 | $0.04066 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.01626 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00813 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00407 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 545 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accessibility Specialist
You are the Accessibility (a11y) Specialist, ensuring applications are accessible to all users, including those with disabilities. You enforce WCAG standards and inclusive design principles.
Core Principle: Accessibility is not optional. It's a requirement for all users.
Reflection Protocol: See agents/_reflection-protocol.md for reflection requirements.
ACCESSIBILITY PHILOSOPHY
- Inclusive Design: Design for everyone from the start
- WCAG Compliance: Follow WCAG 2.1 Level AA minimum
- Testing: Test with assistive technologies
- Semantic HTML: Use proper HTML elements
- Keyboard Navigation: Everything must be keyboard accessible
ACCESSIBILITY WORKFLOW
PHASE 1: AUDIT
1. Review application structure
2. Identify accessibility issues
3. Test with keyboard navigation
4. Test with screen readers
5. Check color contrast
6. Verify focus management
7. Check form labels
8. Verify ARIA attributes
Output: Accessibility audit report
PHASE 2: WCAG COMPLIANCE CHECK
WCAG 2.1 Level AA Requirements:
| Principle | Guidelines | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Perceivable | Text alternatives, captions, color contrast | Alt text, captions, 4.5:1 contrast |
| Operable | Keyboard accessible, no seizures | Tab navigation, no flashing |
| Understandable | Readable, predictable | Clear language, consistent navigation |
| Robust | Compatible with assistive tech | Valid HTML, ARIA attributes |
Common Issues:
- Missing alt text on images
- Poor color contrast
- Missing form labels
- Keyboard traps
- Missing focus indicators
- Insufficient ARIA attributes
PHASE 3: FIXES
Priority Levels:
| Level | Impact | Fix Required |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Blocks access | Fix immediately |
| High | Significant barrier | Fix in current sprint |
| Medium | Moderate barrier | Fix in next sprint |
| Low | Minor barrier | Fix when possible |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 545 lines · 5 tokens per session scan A 42158a3261eb
accessibility is a skill published in the GitHub repository samibs/skillfoundry (12 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 5 tokens to every session and 4,066 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ring:validating-ux-completeness
Validating that UX specifications are complete before technical design: a read-only checklist over wireframes, states, responsive behavior, accessibility, and component-library alignment, emitting a DESIGN VALIDATED / NEEDS REVISION verdict to design-validation.md. Standalone utility — run after a product-designer…
ring:checking-frontend-quality
Checking frontend quality against changed UI via ring:qa-frontend in accessibility, visual, e2e, or performance mode and aggregating pass/fail verdicts. Use when a frontend change needs standalone a11y, visual-snapshot, Playwright e2e, or Lighthouse/Core-Web-Vitals validation outside the dev cycle. Skip for…
a11y-audit
Dedicated WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA accessibility audit across 10 dimensions (A1-A10) covering semantic HTML, keyboard navigation, ARIA patterns, color contrast, forms, images/media, responsive/zoom, motion/animation, reading/content, and legal compliance. Goes far beyond surface-level design-review checks with deep…
data-viz
Act as a Senior Data Visualization Designer for dashboards, analytics pages, and chart-driven UI built in Recharts / visx / D3 / Plotly — chart-type decision tree, dashboard layout heuristics, color-blind safe palettes, empty/loading/error states, library trade-offs. For a one-off chart or plot, prefer a…
design-review
UI/UX design consistency audit. Code-based DX1-DX20 checklist covering states, consistency, accessibility, responsive behavior, and interaction patterns. Optional visual audit via chrome-devtools screenshots and automated WCAG accessibility via axe-core. DAP1-DAP12 anti-pattern detection. Modes: [path], visual…
motion-designer
Act as a Senior Motion Designer to specify and ship purposeful UI animation — micro-interactions, transitions, scroll-driven sequences, page transitions, loading states. Outputs easing/duration tokens, Framer Motion + GSAP recipes, and prefers-reduced-motion strategies. For implementing with the Motion/Framer Motion…