Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/main/.github/skills/planning-and-task-breakdown/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/planning-and-task-breakdown)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/planning-and-task-breakdown"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/planning-and-task-breakdown/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/planning-and-task-breakdown"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/planning-and-task-breakdown.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 209 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01651 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00826 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00330 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
planning-and-task-breakdown scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- planning-and-task-breakdown — 100% identical, 47 lines differ
- planning-and-task-breakdown — 100% identical, 1 lines differ
- planning-and-task-breakdown — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- planning-and-task-breakdown — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- planning-and-task-breakdown — 100% identical, 5 lines differ
- planning-and-task-breakdown — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- planning-and-task-breakdown — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- planning-and-task-breakdown — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 224 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Planning and Task Breakdown
Overview
Decompose work into small, verifiable tasks with explicit acceptance criteria. Good task breakdown is the difference between an agent that completes work reliably and one that produces a tangled mess. Every task should be small enough to implement, test, and verify in a single focused session.
When to Use
- You have a spec and need to break it into implementable units
- A task feels too large or vague to start
- Work needs to be parallelized across multiple agents or sessions
- You need to communicate scope to a human
- The implementation order isn't obvious
When NOT to use: Single-file changes with obvious scope, or when the spec already contains well-defined tasks.
The Planning Process
Step 1: Enter Plan Mode
Before writing any code, operate in read-only mode:
- Read the spec and relevant codebase sections
- Identify existing patterns and conventions
- Map dependencies between components
- Note risks and unknowns
Do NOT write code during planning. The output is a plan document, not implementation.
Step 2: Identify the Dependency Graph
Map what depends on what:
Database schema
│
├── API models/types
│ │
│ ├── API endpoints
│ │ │
│ │ └── Frontend API client
│ │ │
│ │ └── UI components
│ │
│ └── Validation logic
│
└── Seed data / migrations
Implementation order follows the dependency graph bottom-up: build foundations first.
Step 3: Slice Vertically
Instead of building all the database, then all the API, then all the UI — build one complete feature path at a time:
Bad (horizontal slicing):
Task 1: Build entire database schema
Task 2: Build all API endpoints
Task 3: Build all UI components
Task 4: Connect everything
Good (vertical slicing):
Task 1: User can create an account (schema + API + UI for registration)
Task 2: User can log in (auth schema + API + UI for login)
Task 3: User can create a task (task schema + API + UI for creation)
Task 4: User can view task list (query + API + UI for list view)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 224 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A d9dc9a1bea50
planning-and-task-breakdown is a skill published in the GitHub repository shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp (153 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,651 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
quick-capture
Use this skill to drop a new task into GSD Task Manager from any AI assistant that has the gsd-mcp-server connected.
triage-inbox
Use this skill to walk the user through their unfiled or stale tasks and move them into the right Eisenhower quadrant.
6502-assembly
Use when writing or debugging 6502 assembly for the Commodore PET with ca65/ld65 via pet build or pet run. Covers the PET program skeleton, the BASIC SYS stub, calling ROM routines, and 6502 gotchas.
pet-development
Use when developing, running, or debugging Commodore PET software (Commodore BASIC or 6502 assembly) on the VICE emulator with the pet CLI or the pet-tools MCP server. Covers the build/run/observe/debug loop, the stopped-state discipline, PET text encodings, and per-model differences.
6502-debugging
Use when a PET program misbehaves at runtime — crashes, corruption, wrong values, dead input, visual glitches — and you need a procedure, not a guess. Symptom-indexed playbook of runtime debugging procedures using pet-tools.
resume-parser-ats
Deeply parses resume PDFs using the OpenResume 4-step algorithm, extracts structured information (Name, Email, Phone, Education, Work Experience, Skills, etc.), evaluates ATS compatibility, and provides actionable improvement suggestions. Use when a user asks to parse, review, or analyze a resume, check…