Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/main/.github/skills/spec-driven-development/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/spec-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/spec-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/spec-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/spec-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/spec-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 80 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01675 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00838 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00335 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
spec-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 28 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 4 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 95% identical, 6 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spec-Driven Development
Overview
Write a structured specification before writing any code. The spec is the shared source of truth between you and the human engineer — it defines what we're building, why, and how we'll know it's done. Code without a spec is guessing.
When to Use
- Starting a new project or feature
- Requirements are ambiguous or incomplete
- The change touches multiple files or modules
- You're about to make an architectural decision
- The task would take more than 30 minutes to implement
When NOT to use: Single-line fixes, typo corrections, or changes where requirements are unambiguous and self-contained.
The Gated Workflow
Spec-driven development has four phases. Do not advance to the next phase until the current one is validated.
SPECIFY ──→ PLAN ──→ TASKS ──→ IMPLEMENT
│ │ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
Human Human Human Human
reviews reviews reviews reviews
Phase 1: Specify
Start with a high-level vision. Ask the human clarifying questions until requirements are concrete.
Surface assumptions immediately. Before writing any spec content, list what you're assuming:
ASSUMPTIONS I'M MAKING:
1. This is a web application (not native mobile)
2. Authentication uses session-based cookies (not JWT)
3. The database is PostgreSQL (based on existing Prisma schema)
4. We're targeting modern browsers only (no IE11)
→ Correct me now or I'll proceed with these.
Don't silently fill in ambiguous requirements. The spec's entire purpose is to surface misunderstandings before code gets written — assumptions are the most dangerous form of misunderstanding.
Write a spec document covering these six core areas:
-
Objective — What are we building and why? Who is the user? What does success look like?
-
Commands — Full executable commands with flags, not just tool names.
Build: npm run build Test: npm test -- --coverage Lint: npm run lint --fix Dev: npm run dev
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 201 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 6d098845420d
spec-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp (152 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,675 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
quick-capture
Use this skill to drop a new task into GSD Task Manager from any AI assistant that has the gsd-mcp-server connected.
triage-inbox
Use this skill to walk the user through their unfiled or stale tasks and move them into the right Eisenhower quadrant.
6502-assembly
Use when writing or debugging 6502 assembly for the Commodore PET with ca65/ld65 via pet build or pet run. Covers the PET program skeleton, the BASIC SYS stub, calling ROM routines, and 6502 gotchas.
pet-development
Use when developing, running, or debugging Commodore PET software (Commodore BASIC or 6502 assembly) on the VICE emulator with the pet CLI or the pet-tools MCP server. Covers the build/run/observe/debug loop, the stopped-state discipline, PET text encodings, and per-model differences.
6502-debugging
Use when a PET program misbehaves at runtime — crashes, corruption, wrong values, dead input, visual glitches — and you need a procedure, not a guess. Symptom-indexed playbook of runtime debugging procedures using pet-tools.
resume-parser-ats
Deeply parses resume PDFs using the OpenResume 4-step algorithm, extracts structured information (Name, Email, Phone, Education, Work Experience, Skills, etc.), evaluates ATS compatibility, and provides actionable improvement suggestions. Use when a user asks to parse, review, or analyze a resume, check…