Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/main/.github/skills/spec-driven-development/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/spec-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/spec-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/spec-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/spec-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/spec-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 80 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01675 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00670 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00335 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
spec-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 28 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 62 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 16 lines differ
- spec-driven-development — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spec-Driven Development
Overview
Write a structured specification before writing any code. The spec is the shared source of truth between you and the human engineer — it defines what we're building, why, and how we'll know it's done. Code without a spec is guessing.
When to Use
- Starting a new project or feature
- Requirements are ambiguous or incomplete
- The change touches multiple files or modules
- You're about to make an architectural decision
- The task would take more than 30 minutes to implement
When NOT to use: Single-line fixes, typo corrections, or changes where requirements are unambiguous and self-contained.
The Gated Workflow
Spec-driven development has four phases. Do not advance to the next phase until the current one is validated.
SPECIFY ──→ PLAN ──→ TASKS ──→ IMPLEMENT
│ │ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
Human Human Human Human
reviews reviews reviews reviews
Phase 1: Specify
Start with a high-level vision. Ask the human clarifying questions until requirements are concrete.
Surface assumptions immediately. Before writing any spec content, list what you're assuming:
ASSUMPTIONS I'M MAKING:
1. This is a web application (not native mobile)
2. Authentication uses session-based cookies (not JWT)
3. The database is PostgreSQL (based on existing Prisma schema)
4. We're targeting modern browsers only (no IE11)
→ Correct me now or I'll proceed with these.
Don't silently fill in ambiguous requirements. The spec's entire purpose is to surface misunderstandings before code gets written — assumptions are the most dangerous form of misunderstanding.
Write a spec document covering these six core areas:
-
Objective — What are we building and why? Who is the user? What does success look like?
-
Commands — Full executable commands with flags, not just tool names.
Build: npm run build Test: npm test -- --coverage Lint: npm run lint --fix Dev: npm run dev
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 201 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 6d098845420d
spec-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp (174 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,675 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
using-entire
Use as the FIRST action on any research, investigation, or codebase-understanding request — "research X", "investigate X", "look into X", "dig into X", "search X", "explore X", "understand X", "why is this like this" — before Glob, Grep, or Read. Recorded intent lives in Entire checkpoints on the server, not in local…
hevy-cli
Manage Hevy workouts from the terminal: read and summarize training data, search exercise templates, and create or update workouts, routines, exercises, folders, or body measurements.
hevy-workouts
Use when the user asks to inspect, summarize, plan, log, or update Hevy workouts, routines, exercises, or body measurements.
verify
Run the checks that have to pass before a FreeReps commit lands — Go build, vet, tests and golangci-lint, the frontend type check and build, and the document contract check. Triggers — "verify", "prüf das durch", "vor dem commit", "läuft das durch", "check before committing", "run the checks", "does CI pass". Not for…
sentry
Use when the user asks to inspect Sentry issues or events, summarize recent production errors, or pull basic Sentry health data via the Sentry CLI; perform read-only queries using the sentry command.
wayfinder
Plan a huge chunk of work — more than one agent session can hold — as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.