rigorous-paper-author

rigorous-paper-author is a skill for Claude Code from shubham0704/claude-skills. It costs 92 tokens per session (2,223 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A writing workflow for mathematically rigorous research papers in areas such as machine learning, scientific computing, numerical analysis, control, geometry, and applied mathematics.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan or revise theory-heavy LaTeX papers, build a claim-and-proof structure, and keep mathematical notation consistent.
Why use it?
It helps connect assumptions, definitions, theorems, proofs, algorithms, experiments, and figures into one logically supported argument.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the rigorous-paper-author plugin — 1 skill shipped together

Good fit Use it to plan or revise theory-heavy LaTeX papers, build a claim-and-proof structure, and keep mathematical notation consistent.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-author
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add shubham0704/claude-skills --skill rigorous-paper-author
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shubham0704/claude-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install rigorous-paper-author, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for rigorous-paper-author

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-author/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-author)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-author/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for rigorous-paper-author

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-author.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 92 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,223 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00092 $0.02223
Opus 5 $0.00046 $0.01111
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00445
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00222

Measured 12d ago against content hash 76de45abc2e0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

rigorous-paper-author scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

rigorous-paper-author/SKILL.md · 241 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 241 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the paper architect and technical writer.

Your job is not merely to produce prose. Your job is to turn a research contribution into a coherent mathematical argument with a clean narrative spine.

Operating procedure

1) Start with a claim graph

Before writing prose, identify:

  • the main scientific claim
  • the main mathematical claim(s)
  • supporting lemmas / propositions / assumptions
  • algorithmic claims
  • empirical claims
  • figure claims

Represent the paper as a dependency graph:

  • problem setup -> assumptions -> method -> theory -> experiments -> conclusion
  • theorem A depends on definitions D1-Dk and lemmas L1-Lm
  • experiment E_i validates claim C_i
  • appendix item P_i discharges proof obligation O_i

Do not begin section drafting until this graph is explicit. Use assets/claim_proof_experiment_map.md for the template.

2) Build a notation ledger first

Create a notation ledger before heavy writing. For every symbol, record:

  • symbol
  • meaning
  • type / space / dimension
  • first section where introduced
  • later sections where reused
  • whether overloaded

Rules:

  • one symbol, one meaning unless there is a compelling reason otherwise
  • define spaces before elements
  • define operators before their derived forms
  • define norms, inner products, and function classes explicitly
  • introduce asymptotic variables for complexity and sample complexity early
  • keep notation stable across theorem, algorithm, proof, and experiment sections

3) Create section contracts

For each section, define:

  • its purpose
  • what the reader must know on entry
  • what the reader must know on exit
  • which later sections depend on it

Use the blueprint in assets/paper_blueprint.md.

4) Draft in this order

Default order:

  1. problem statement and assumptions
  2. notation / preliminaries
  3. method
  4. theorem statements and proof plan
  5. experiments design
  6. introduction
  7. abstract
  8. appendix roadmap
  9. conclusion

Reason: The introduction should summarize a structure that already exists.

Read the full file on GitHub · 241 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 241 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 76de45abc2e0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

rigorous-paper-author is a skill published in the GitHub repository shubham0704/claude-skills (1 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 2,223 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

thesis-control

Use when AI-assisted thesis or manuscript edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of intended use, experiment-role promotion, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides author-intent control, lightweight or strict contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.

yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit · 57 tokens

manuscript-reframe

Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.

yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit · 53 tokens

paper-writer

Medical/scientific paper writing workflow skill. Manages the full pipeline from literature search to submission-ready manuscript. Creates and manages a project directory with IMRAD-format section files, literature matrix, reference management, and quality checklists. Supports both English and Japanese papers.…

kgraph57/paper-writer-skill · 106 tokens

food-research

Run a comprehensive, multi-source literature and evidence-synthesis workflow for food & nutrition science. Use when the user wants to research a food/nutrition topic in depth, do a literature review, build an evidence brief, screen and synthesize many sources, verify citations, or scope a systematic review.…

PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition · 154 tokens

food-paper

Multi-subagent manuscript system for food & nutrition science covering the whole research process: understand the field, frame research questions, curate and analyze data, run statistics, build figures and tables, construct the discussion, draft, polish, and self-review — journal-aware throughout. Includes a…

PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition · 180 tokens

food-pipeline

Master orchestrator for the whole food & nutrition research-to-publication workflow. Coordinates the specialist skills — each with its own subagent set — into one governed path: journal selection, research (food-research / food-deep-research), writing & analysis (food-paper), figures (food-figure), peer review…

PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition · 137 tokens