Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add smk-labs/claude-plugins --skill figgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smk-labs/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/smk-labs/claude-plugins/fig)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/smk-labs/claude-plugins/fig"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smk-labs/claude-plugins/fig/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/smk-labs/claude-plugins/fig"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smk-labs/claude-plugins/fig.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.01449 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00580 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00290 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
fig scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Some ideas are explained better by a 5-second looping animation than by 100 lines of text.
Sketch the figure in ASCII first: static layout, labelled motion, loop length. Get a yes before writing the svg.
After building, look at the rendered file as a stranger would and refine once before handing back. ASCII covers structure; visual issues (collisions, weak contrast, orphan elements, dated chrome, loose components that should be grouped) only appear on screen.
Guidelines
- Subject fit. Invent a visual metaphor for this specific idea. The same concept can be drawn many ways (a flow as a path, ripples, falling sand, expanding rings; a network as nodes, a constellation, a colony of pulses). Reach past the obvious shape.
- One accent. One thing moves meaningfully, in one accent colour. Show direction through motion, not a second hue.
- Loop cleanly. End frame equals start frame, or fade-pause-fade. No jerk at the seam.
- Caption economy. One short title plus a 5-word caption at most. The figure carries it.
- Calm by default. 5 to 10 second loops,
easeInOutCubicoreaseInOutSine. Bounce and elastic read as toy.
Pick fonts, palette, background, canvas, and layout for the subject. Nothing below is a default.
Stack
One HTML file, one inline <svg>, motion in CSS. No JavaScript, no CDN, no build step.
That is not taste, it is the delivery format. A fig is made to be embedded: as an <img> in a report, as an attachment in an email, as a paste in a slide. Every one of those lifts the <svg> out and renders it as its own document. In that document no script ever runs and nothing is fetched. A figure animated from JavaScript freezes on its first frame there, or shows nothing at all. CSS @keyframes and SMIL are the only motion that survives the trip.
Five rules that document imposes. Break one and the figure dies quietly, looking fine on your screen:
- Everything lives inside
<svg>. The<style>, the gradients, the filters. Only the svg element travels; whatever sits in<head>is left behind. xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"on the svg. An HTML parser forgives a missing namespace. An<img>renders nothing without it.- Strict XML. Every tag closes, and no bare
<or&anywhere, including inside a CSS comment, where it is easiest to forget. Write<and&. - No
<script>, no event handlers, norequestAnimationFrame. - RTL is declared, never inherited.
dir="rtl"is an HTML attribute and means nothing to an svg document, and the host page's direction stops at the image boundary. Putstyle="direction:rtl"on the<svg>itself, or everytext-anchor="start"label jumps to the wrong side of its anchor.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines · -18 tokens per session f167f30feb72
- 1mo ago First seen · 100 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 903153fa1f9c
fig is a skill published in the GitHub repository smk-labs/claude-plugins (11 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,449 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pmm-resume
Reviews and tailors a PMM resume (IC to VP, including AI PMM roles): dissects the job description, ranks bullets by impact fit and rebuilds the complete resume in one pass. Trigger on: resume + JD paste, "tailor this", "which bullets for this role", "rebuild for [company]", "review my PMM resume", "reframe for…
product-marketing-context
Builds and maintains the shared GTM brain (product context, ICP, positioning, voice, market context, proof points, plus optional strategy and execution sections and the deal-reality fields) that every other skill reads before producing output. Works standalone from your own answers, and gets stronger when you connect…
competitor-deep-dive
Builds a long-form, fully sourced deep-dive on one competitor for a named decision (strategy call, RFP, pricing change, roadmap bet), with dated reviews, deal evidence, a head-to-head per offering and where they win. Triggers: "deep-dive on [competitor]", "full competitor write-up", "what do users really say about…
workflow-orchestrator
Chains positioning, competitive, GTM strategy, campaign briefs, stakeholder maps and retros into one coherent PMM program with a master document and brain updates. Trigger on: "run full GTM workflow", "run a full launch", "launch [product] end to end", "positioning refresh", "quarterly PMM cycle", "competitive…
positioning-messaging
Builds or audits positioning statements, messaging hierarchies, homepage copy and persona cards using April Dunford's Obviously Awesome framework, in five modes (build, audit, fletch, sales-enablement, homepage). Refuses to generate without a named primary persona and 3+ alternatives including status quo, and blocks…
writing-assistant
Rewrites, sharpens and drafts B2B writing in the writer's real voice: Slack messages, emails, memos, PRDs, decks, plus marketing content (blog posts, landing pages, press releases, case studies, newsletters, social posts). Use whenever someone wants to rewrite, tighten, draft or audit copy, asks why copy isn't landing…