Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners --skill test-first-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runnersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners/test-first-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners/test-first-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners/test-first-development.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00250 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00125 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00050 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
test-first-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Test-First Development
Metadata
- Version: 1.0.0
- Triggers: Behavior change, bug fix, or refactor with observable behavior
- Allowed agents: Daemon, Neon, Grid Master
- Side effects: Adds or changes tests and implementation
When to Use
Use for executable behavior. For pure documentation or configuration without a practical executable assertion, record why a test is not appropriate and use the strongest available validation.
Inputs
Acceptance criterion, current behavior, project test conventions, and relevant command registry entry.
Procedure
- Write one minimal test for the desired behavior.
- Run it and confirm it fails for the missing behavior, not a test defect.
- Implement the smallest passing change.
- Run the focused test and relevant broader suite.
- Refactor only while green.
- Repeat for the next behavior.
Verification
Record the expected failing observation and the later passing observation. A test that never failed does not prove the change.
Output
Test added, red evidence, implementation summary, green evidence, and justified exceptions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 39 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 5e2687121302
test-first-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository Stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 250 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
engram-testing-coverage
TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.
nw-fp-clojure
Clojure language-specific patterns, data-first modeling, REPL-driven development, and spec.
strict-tdd
Strict RED->GREEN->REFACTOR test-driven development with enforcement. Never write production code before a failing test. Atomic commits per TDD cycle.
mobiai-mobile-tdd
You MUST use this before writing any implementation code for a mobile feature, bug fix, refactor, or behavior change. Tests come before implementation — no exceptions.
tdd
This skill should be used when the user wants to implement features or fix bugs using test-driven development. Enforces the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle with vertical slicing, context isolation between test writing and implementation, human checkpoints, and auto-test feedback loops. Uses multi-agent orchestration with the…
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.