plan

A planning tool that breaks a large software project into tasks that can be tracked and completed in stages. It can use a codebase audit or workflow audit when available, or create a plan from the beginning.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan feature work, organise fixes from an audit, estimate implementation effort, define testing and rollback needs, and write the plan to the project.
Why use it?
It turns a broad request into a prioritised plan and makes each task’s size, urgency, risk, value, effort, and potential impact clear. This helps teams decide what to do first and how to test or undo changes.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/terryc21/workflow-audit/plan
Any agent
npx skills add Terryc21/workflow-audit --skill plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Terryc21/workflow-audit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 53 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 6,446 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00053 $0.06446
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.03223
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.01289
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00645

Measured 2d ago against content hash b73ba76cf120, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/plan/SKILL.md · 705 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 705 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Implementation Plan Generator

Quick Ref: Mode detect → ingest or analyze → interactive input → understand → size → impact → phased plan → risk → test → rollback → write → proceed.

YOU MUST EXECUTE THIS WORKFLOW. Do not just describe it.

Required output: Every task MUST include Size, Urgency, Risk, ROI, Blast Radius, and LOE ratings. Do not omit these ratings.

Rating format: See radar-suite-core.md for column definitions, indicator scale, and table formatting rules.

Pre-flight: Git Safety Check

git status --short

If uncommitted changes exist:

AskUserQuestion with questions:
[
  {
    "question": "You have uncommitted changes. Commit before proceeding?",
    "header": "Git",
    "options": [
      {"label": "Commit first (Recommended)", "description": "Save current work so you can revert if this skill modifies files"},
      {"label": "Continue without committing", "description": "Proceed — I accept the risk"}
    ],
    "multiSelect": false
  }
]

If "Commit first": Ask for a commit message, stage changed files, and commit. Then proceed.


Golden Rule

Plans describe WHAT to change and WHERE — never HOW.

A plan task says: "Add keyboard dismissal to AddItemView.swift:45-80 and EditItemView.swift:32-60. Acceptance: tapping outside any text field dismisses the keyboard."

A plan task does NOT say: "Add .onTapGesture { UIApplication.shared.sendAction(#selector(UIResponder.resignFirstResponder)...) }"

Exception: Include code (≤10 lines) ONLY when referencing an existing pattern in the repo, showing a required API signature, or documenting a known framework gotcha. The two worked examples at the end of this file show the calibration.

Step 1: Mode Detection

Detect which mode to run in: audit-aware, workflow-audit-aware, or standalone.

# Check for codebase audit reports
Glob pattern=".agents/research/*-codebase-audit.md"
Glob pattern=".agents/research/*-tech-reportcard.md"

# Check for workflow audit handoff
Glob pattern=".workflow-audit/handoff.yaml"

Read the full file on GitHub · 705 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 705 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A b73ba76cf120

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository Terryc21/workflow-audit (58 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 6,446 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

ui-enhancer-radar

Systematic iOS/SwiftUI UI audit with design intent interview, 14-domain analysis (including Color Audit with adaptive Color Profile, iPad Sheet Sizing caller-side audit, Button Hit Region three-factor interaction audit, and Silent Picker menu-presentation audit), element compaction, cross-view consistency checks…

Terryc21/radar-suite · 148 tokens

ui-path-radar

UI path tracer for SwiftUI/UIKit apps. 5-layer audit with 34 issue categories and 19 automated checks: discover entry points, trace flows, detect dead ends and broken promises, evaluate UX impact, verify data wiring. Supports targeted trace, diff against previous audits, and handoff to planning skills. Triggers…

Terryc21/radar-suite · 86 tokens

roundtrip-radar

Per-journey code audit tracing data through complete user flows for bugs, data safety, performance, and round-trip completeness. Discovers workflows, audits each end-to-end, rolls up cross-cutting issues, and supports natural-language flow tracing. Triggers: "roundtrip audit", "trace user journey", "/roundtrip-radar".

Terryc21/radar-suite · 73 tokens

capstone-radar

Unified A-F grading and ship/no-ship decisions for the 6-skill radar family (5 companions + capstone). Aggregates handoffs from data-model, ui-path, roundtrip, time-bomb, and ui-enhancer; owns 5 grep-reliable domains; tracks velocity; celebrates improvements. Triggers: "capstone radar", "can I ship", "grade codebase"…

Terryc21/radar-suite · 91 tokens

time-bomb-radar

Finds deferred operations that crash on aged data -- code that passes every test but breaks weeks or months after release. Covers cascade deletes, cache expiry, trial paths, background accumulation, date-threshold transitions, and scheduled side effects. Triggers: "time bomb", "time-bomb", "/time-bomb-radar", "aged…

Terryc21/radar-suite · 80 tokens

radar-suite

Unified entry point for the 6-skill radar family (5 companions + capstone). Routes to individual skills, runs targeted (Tier 2) or full (Tier 3) audit sequences, owns the unified ledger, and provides cross-skill operations (status, verify, ledger, link, deferred, fresh/no-fresh). Triggers: "radar suite", "full audit"…

Terryc21/radar-suite · 94 tokens