Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/tykisgod/quick-question/codex-plan-reviewnpx skills add tykisgod/quick-question --skill codex-plan-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tykisgod/quick-questionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tykisgod/quick-question/codex-plan-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tykisgod/quick-question/codex-plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tykisgod/quick-question/codex-plan-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01772 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00886 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00354 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00177 |
Grade A, and why
codex-plan-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Invoke scripts via
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/<name>. That env var is set by Claude Code for every plugin context and gives the absolute path to the marketplace clone — no PATH or cwd assumptions. Bare-command invocation (e.g.plan-review.sh) is NOT reliable: the plugin never puts its scripts on PATH, so bare calls exit 127.
Respond in the user's preferred language (detect from their recent messages, or fall back to the language setting in CLAUDE.md).
Send a design document to Codex CLI for review, then revise the document based on the findings. Automatically loops until no critical issues remain or 5 rounds are completed.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
- A file path to a design document or plan
- No arguments: default to the most recently modified
.mdfile underDocs/
Execution Flow
1. Determine the Target File
Try in order of priority:
- If the user specified a file path, use it
- Otherwise check the current conversation for a Claude-generated plan (typically under
Docs/or similar), use the most recent one - If no plan file exists either, review the current conversation context — find the most recently discussed design proposal, refactoring suggestion, or review conclusion, write it as a temporary spec file (
Docs/qq/<branch-name>/tmp-review-spec_<YYYYMMDD-HHmm>.md, timestamped). Get branch name with:git branch --show-current | tr '/' '_' - Last resort: use
ls -t Docs/**/*.md | grep -v '/qq/' | head -1to find the most recently modified design document (excluding qq-generated artifacts)
2-6. Automatic Review Loop
Loops automatically without prompting the user each round. Loop termination conditions (stop when any is met):
- No
[Critical]issues in the Codex review result - 5 rounds have been completed
Each round:
2a. Send to Codex for Review
Run the following command using the Bash tool with run_in_background: true:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/plan-review.sh <file_path>
The script calls codex exec --sandbox read-only, outputting results to stdout and <filename>_review.md.
The script automatically reads the project root's CLAUDE.md and includes the coding standards in the Codex prompt.
Codex review typically takes 5-10 minutes. With background execution, the system automatically notifies you when done — no sleep or polling needed.
Inform the user that the background task has been submitted and will continue automatically upon completion. You may continue other conversation with the user while waiting.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 111 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 71d11a2067cf
codex-plan-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository tykisgod/quick-question (11 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,772 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
google-ads-audit
Google Ads account audit and business context setup. Run this first — it gathers business information, analyzes account health, and saves context that all other ads skills reuse. Trigger on "audit my ads", "ads audit", "set up my ads", "onboard", "account overview", "how's my account", "ads health check", "what should…
review
5-pass structured code review — correctness, security, performance, readability, consistency.
alive:system-upgrade
Upgrade ALIVE to the current version. Handles v1/v2/v3.x source states, multi-surface aware (alive-mcp / Hermes / Codex), retroactive version detection, partial-failure resume, dry-run previews, and rollback inspection.
codex-test-gen
Generate unit tests for specified functions using Codex MCP.
brand-docx
Brand-aware Word engine. Use to (1) EXTRACT a company's brand from a Word template into a reusable "Brand Profile", (2) COMPREHEND the template with the model (optional), (3) VERIFY it, (4) GENERATE new on-brand .docx documents FROM a saved profile. Trigger on "extract our brand", "learn/match this template", "use our…
extract-resume
Parse a resume's uploaded PDF into structured JSON (basics, experience, projects, skills, education) and save it to the editor.