Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to u9401066/med-paper-assistant. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/master/.claude/skills/pubmed-mcp-tools-reference/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/pubmed-mcp-tools-reference)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/pubmed-mcp-tools-reference"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/pubmed-mcp-tools-reference/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/pubmed-mcp-tools-reference"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/pubmed-mcp-tools-reference.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Prompt Injection · line 66 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 186 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02344 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01172 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00469 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00234 |
Grade A, and why
pubmed-mcp-tools-reference scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- pubmed-mcp-tools-reference — 91% identical, 236 lines differ
- pubmed-mcp-tools-reference — 88% identical, 241 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 250 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PubMed Search MCP 工具完整參考
描述
PubMed Search MCP 工具的版本相依參考，包含參數說明和使用範例。工具數量必須以目前安裝版本的 runtime registry/resource 為準，不可沿用本檔的歷史數字。
能力導向使用請先看 docs/TOOLS_USAGE_GUIDE.zh-TW.md。
⚠️ 注意：此文件由
scripts/count_mcp_tools.py --update-docs自動生成。 手動修改會在下次執行時被覆蓋。
濃縮理解模型
目前 pinned v0.4.4 的自動生成索引是 40 個工具，但建議先用 8 個能力族理解；升級後先查 runtime registry。
- 理論最小下限：6 個 multiplexed meta-tools
- 實務可理解下限：8 個能力族
- 建議：先學能力族，再查完整工具表
能力族如下：搜尋、查詢規劃、論文探索、全文與取得、視覺與脈絡、實體與術語、結果與記憶、自動化與保存。
工具分類總覽
| 類別 | 工具數 | 主要用途 |
|---|---|---|
| 搜尋工具 | 1 | Unified multi-source literature search gateway |
| 查詢智能 | 3 | MeSH expansion, agent-provided PICO handoff, and query analysis |
| 文章探索 | 5 | 相關文章、引用網路 |
| 全文工具 | 2 | 全文取得與文本挖掘 |
| NCBI 延伸 | 7 | Gene, PubChem, ClinVar |
| 引用網絡 | 1 | 引用樹建構與探索 |
| 匯出工具 | 2 | 引用格式匯出與本機文獻筆記保存 |
| Session 管理 | 5 | PMID 暫存與歷史 |
| 機構訂閱 | 5 | OpenURL Link Resolver |
| 視覺搜索 | 1 | 圖片分析與搜索 (實驗性) |
| ICD 轉換 | 1 | ICD-10 與 MeSH 轉換 |
| 研究時間軸 | 3 | 研究演化追蹤與里程碑偵測 |
| 引用驗證 | 1 | Reference list verification with PubMed evidence |
| 圖表擷取 | 1 | 文章圖表與視覺資料擷取 |
| 圖片搜尋 | 1 | 生物醫學圖片搜尋 |
| Pipeline 管理 | 7 | Pipeline 持久化、載入、排程 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 250 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 7cf18d3708f3
pubmed-mcp-tools-reference is a skill published in the GitHub repository u9401066/med-paper-assistant (12 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,344 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
thesis-control
Use when AI-assisted thesis or manuscript edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of intended use, experiment-role promotion, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides author-intent control, lightweight or strict contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.
manuscript-reframe
Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.
tikz-figure-review
Review and fix alignment, label collision, clipping, legend-over-data, overlap, and layout issues in TikZ and pgfplots figures inside LaTeX documents. Use when the user wants to review figures in a paper, tutorial, lecture notes, or thesis before submission; when a reviewer flags figure problems; when a rendered…
animating-computational-mechanics
Animate continuum mechanics, tensor calculus, and finite element concepts — deformation gradients, polar decomposition, Cauchy/Piola–Kirchhoff stresses, weak form, mesh convergence — using Matplotlib (FuncAnimation), Manim (ValueTracker / applyfunction / Transform), or Blender (bpy + ParaView .obj pipeline). Use when…
refining-ml-papers
Refines ML/scientific LaTeX papers based on reviewer or advisor feedback. Handles structural reorganization (moving problem statements, merging sections), concrete instantiations of abstract tables, cross-file deduplication, and compilation verification. Use when the user requests paper revisions, addresses reviewer…
rigorous-paper-reviewer
Review a LaTeX research paper for mathematical rigor, notation consistency, proof obligations, numerical-analysis discipline, complexity claims, convergence/error bounds, figure quality, reader-state flow, cross-references, and global coherence. Use when the user wants a deep technical review or verification pass on a…