integrity-forensics

integrity-forensics is a skill for Claude Code from wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep. It costs 162 tokens per session (4,302 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A fixed-version review process for checking a research paper for possible data, statistics, or reporting problems. It uses evidence tied to exact passages and reports proposed findings without making the final judgment itself.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit a paper for integrity issues, inspect the evidence behind claims, and turn the review result into a policy check.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers examine paper claims consistently and avoid relying only on an informal reading.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions Claude Code; mentions Codex.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is ( cd "$CLONE_DIR" && python3 eval/run_eval.py ) || {.

Good fit Use it to audit a paper for integrity issues, inspect the evidence behind claims, and turn the review result into a policy check.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
About the project

ARIS is a collection of Markdown-based skills that define a workflow for autonomous machine-learning research, including idea discovery, experiment automation, and review loops. Researchers and AI coding agents use it across tools such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenClaw without depending on a single framework. The catalogue entries are ARIS workflow skills and agents.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 15,970 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/integrity-forensics

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for integrity-forensics

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/integrity-forensics/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/integrity-forensics)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/integrity-forensics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/integrity-forensics/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for integrity-forensics

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/integrity-forensics"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/integrity-forensics.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 162 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,302 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Rogue Agent · line 41
    Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.
    Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00162 $0.04302
Opus 5 $0.00081 $0.02151
Sonnet 5 $0.00032 $0.00860
Haiku 4.5 $0.00016 $0.00430

Measured 4d ago against content hash 33cdf3f4fd2a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

integrity-forensics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/integrity-forensics/SKILL.md · 285 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 285 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Integrity Forensics — thin launcher for Anti-Autoresearch

Audit target: $ARGUMENTS

What this is. ARIS generates papers; Anti-Autoresearch is its outward-pointed dual — reviewer-side integrity forensics (46 patterns across 8 families, deterministic GRIM/GRIMMER/statcheck core, span-anchored claims, a rules-only reporter that summarizes rather than adjudicates). This skill is a thin launcher: it pins an upstream commit, validates the pin with the upstream eval gate, delegates execution unchanged, and post-processes the verdict into ARIS's policy vocabulary. It vendors nothing and forks nothing.

🔁 Cadence fence (shared-references/external-cadence.md): this skill is verdict-bearing decision support. Do not wrap it in /loop / /schedule — and NEVER as "iterate edits until it stops flagging" (see The One Forbidden Loop below).

Constants

  • ANTI_AR_REPO = https://github.com/wanshuiyin/Anti-Autoresearch.git
  • ANTI_AR_COMMIT = b47af6f983b38347b6d2110379e266400597cf66 — the SHA-pin. The launcher NEVER tracks upstream HEAD; bumping this constant is a reviewed change (see Pin-bump checklist).
  • CLONE_DIR = ~/.aris/anti-autoresearch — the pinned working copy. Host-neutral on purpose: ARIS also runs on DeepSeek Harness, Codex CLI, Cursor, Trae, Antigravity and Copilot CLI, where ~/.claude/ would name an installation the user does not have. An older clone at ~/.claude/anti-autoresearch is unused; move it and its .aris_eval_ok_* receipt only to keep an offline deterministic-only run working, otherwise delete it whenever convenient.
  • NO REVIEWER KNOBS. This launcher exposes no reviewer model/effort parameters and never maps ARIS — effort: onto upstream settings. The pinned upstream runs exactly what it pins (gpt-6-astra + xhigh, its own design decision). Overriding upstream review policy from a launcher would create a second, unauditable configuration surface.
  • GATE_HELPER = forensics_gate.py — resolved via the canonical chain (shared-references/integration-contract.md §2): .aris/tools/tools/$ARIS_REPO/tools/$ARIS_REPO/tools/ via ~/.aris/repo. Failure policy A (required): if it cannot be resolved at assurance: submission, STOP — never improvise the gate.

Read the full file on GitHub · 285 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago Changed 33cdf3f4fd2a
  2. 12d ago First seen · 285 lines · 162 tokens per session scan A ff20f4b76094

Subscribe to this mod's changes

integrity-forensics is a skill published in the GitHub repository wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep (15,970 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 162 tokens to every session and 4,302 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

remote-compute-ssh

Evaluate and use SSH Remote Compute before choosing where to run GPU, high-memory, parallel, batch, model-inference, bioinformatics, or other long-running scientific work; supports short remote commands and asynchronous jobs with automatic harvest and analysis.

aipoch/open-science · 53 tokens

paper-narrative

Judge and reshape the story told by an entire paper figure deck. Use when writing or revising a paper to derive a grounded brief from the manuscript and captions, review the full deck as a handling editor, and hand an ordered figure arc to figure-composer.

aipoch/open-science · 58 tokens

esmfold2

Biohub ESMFold2 / ESMFold2-Fast all-atom co-folding (Candido et al. 2026, github.com/Biohub/esm). Single-sequence and MSA modes; protein, DNA, RNA, ligand (CCD/SMILES), modified residues. FoldBench Ab-Ag 50-55%, PPI 70-77% DockQ-pass. Also covers the ESMC-{300M,600M,6B} protein language models from the same release…

aipoch/open-science · 223 tokens

literature-review

Find, verify, and synthesize scientific literature — from "what's the seminal paper for X" through full multi-source reviews. Covers grounding claims in real retrieved sources, avoiding fabricated citations, handling retractions, and calibrating confidence to evidence strength.

aipoch/open-science · 54 tokens

scvi-tools

Probabilistic single-cell RNA-seq with scvi-tools — scVI for a batch-corrected latent space, scANVI for semi-supervised label transfer, and Bayesian differential expression. Reach for this skill to integrate scRNA-seq batches, embed cells for clustering, transfer annotations from a reference onto a query, or score…

aipoch/open-science · 100 tokens

figure-composer

Compose one publication-grade multi-panel figure. Start from a one-line claim plus immutable data Artifact Version references, or inspect an existing figure and draft its outline directly. Plan a 12-column panel outline, delegate one worker per panel, compose and inspect the result, then run at most three adversarial…

aipoch/open-science · 93 tokens