Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wdavidturner/product-skills --skill shape-upgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wdavidturner/product-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wdavidturner/product-skills/shape-up)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wdavidturner/product-skills/shape-up"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wdavidturner/product-skills/shape-up/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wdavidturner/product-skills/shape-up"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wdavidturner/product-skills/shape-up.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.01193 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00596 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00239 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
shape-up scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Shape Up
What It Is
Shape Up is a product development methodology built on one core insight: you cannot estimate your way to shipping—you must shape your way there.
Traditional approaches ask "How long will this take?" and then try to hit that estimate. Shape Up flips this: decide upfront how much time you're willing to spend (the appetite), then shape a version of the solution that fits within that constraint.
The methodology emerged from 17 years of building Basecamp, where the founding team faced an unusual constraint: their only engineer (DHH) worked just 10 hours per week. This forced extreme clarity about what to build and ruthless scoping to ensure every hour counted. As the company grew, they formalized these practices into Shape Up to maintain startup speed at scale.
The key shift: Move from "What's the estimate for this?" to "What version of this can we confidently ship in the time we're willing to spend?"
When to Use It
Use Shape Up when you need to:
- Stop projects from dragging — work that should take weeks is taking months
- Escape the estimate trap — you're tired of estimates that are always wrong
- Give teams real autonomy — not just ticket execution
- Reduce meeting overhead — Scrum rituals are consuming your time
- Ship meaningful chunks — not just incremental tickets that don't add up to anything
- Align product and engineering — there's a wall between them today
- Maintain startup speed — as you scale past 30-50 people
When Not to Use It
Don't use Shape Up when:
- You're 3 people or fewer — just talk to each other, formalization isn't needed yet
- There's no real complexity — simple tasks don't need shaping
- You can't get engineering into shaping — without technical input, shaping fails
- Leadership isn't bought in — you need exec support to protect build time
- You're doing pure maintenance — bug fixes don't need the full process
Patterns
Detailed examples showing how to apply Shape Up correctly. Each pattern shows a common mistake and the correct approach.
What ships with it
16 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- patterns/_template.md 460 B
- patterns/betting-table-dysfunction.md 2.0 KB
- patterns/circuit-breaker-fear.md 2.1 KB
- patterns/cool-down-skipping.md 1.9 KB
- patterns/estimates-vs-appetite.md 1.7 KB
- patterns/fuzzy-problem.md 2.0 KB
- patterns/hill-chart-theater.md 1.9 KB
- patterns/junior-detail-dial.md 2.2 KB
- patterns/missing-kickoff.md 2.0 KB
- patterns/scope-hammering.md 2.0 KB
- patterns/shaping-without-engineering.md 2.1 KB
- patterns/ten-pound-bag.md 2.0 KB
- patterns/tickets-not-projects.md 2.1 KB
- patterns/too-abstract-shaping.md 1.8 KB
- patterns/unshaped-work.md 2.2 KB
- references/shape-up-playbook.md 9.9 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 97 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A 22e09e13eb47
shape-up is a skill published in the GitHub repository wdavidturner/product-skills (20 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 1,193 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
story-readiness
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is…
projects
List all managed projects with status, branch, open PRs, and open issue counts — portfolio-level view.
magpie-security-issue-import-from-md
Open one or more tracking issues from a markdown file containing a batch of security findings. Each finding becomes one tracker landing in the Needs triage board column. The file itself is the full report — there is no inbound reporter to reply to and no PR to inspect.