agentmods.dev

paper-review

paper-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from woliveiras/geremmyas. It costs 36 tokens per session (1,693 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An editing guide for academic papers that removes common AI-like writing patterns while keeping the original claims and citations.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to rewrite abstracts, paper sections, and other academic passages, but not blog posts or entirely new content.
Why use it?
It makes drafts read more naturally without changing the research content or evidence they cite.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

not rated 10repo 3mo ago A scan 36 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to rewrite abstracts, paper sections, and other academic passages, but not blog posts or entirely new content.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/paper-review
View source ↗ woliveiras/geremmyas
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add woliveiras/geremmyas --skill paper-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/woliveiras/geremmyas

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for paper-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/paper-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/paper-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/paper-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/paper-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for paper-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/paper-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/paper-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,693 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.01693
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00677
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00339
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00169

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 1be1f89d219a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

paper-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

content/skills/paper-review/SKILL.md · 113 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Rewrite the given text directly. No preamble, no explanation, no list of changes — deliver the rewritten text and nothing else.

What to eliminate

General AI tells (applies to all sections)

Remove or replace every instance of:

  • Em dashes (—): use a comma, parentheses, or a new sentence instead
  • Curly quotes and apostrophes (“ ” ‘ ’): use straight quotes so the text carries no copy-paste fingerprint
  • "delve into", "dive deep", "unpack", "explore" (as a section opener), "tackle"
  • "robust", "seamless", "powerful", "cutting-edge", "leverage" (verb), "harness" (verb), "utilize" (use "use")
  • "crucial", "essential", "vital", "pivotal", "key" (when used as a filler adjective)
  • AI-vocabulary words: "testament", "tapestry", "landscape" (as an abstract noun), "underscore", "showcase", "foster", "garner", "intricate", "intricacies", "meticulous", "realm"
  • "It's worth noting that", "It goes without saying", "Needless to say", "It is important to note that"
  • "In the realm of", "In the landscape of", "When it comes to", "In today's X world"
  • Forced tricolons (the rule of three): "accurate, efficient, and scalable" — keep if the three properties are independently measured, cut if decorative
  • Hedging strings: "may potentially", "could possibly suggest", "might arguably be considered" → pick one hedge or eliminate
  • Significance and legacy padding: "stands as a testament to", "plays a pivotal role", "marks a turning point", "reflects a broader shift", "contributes to the broader field of" — state the specific finding instead
  • Trailing present-participle analysis: "-ing" clauses that editorialize at the end of a sentence ("...highlighting its significance", "...underscoring the importance", "...reflecting a broader trend") — cut or replace with a sourced claim
  • Copula avoidance: "serves as", "stands as", "represents" where "is" is meant — prefer the plain "is"
  • Vague attribution: "experts argue", "researchers note", "studies show", "it is widely regarded" without a citation — attach the citation or delete the claim

Read the full file on GitHub · 113 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 113 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 1be1f89d219a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

paper-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository woliveiras/geremmyas (10 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,693 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

ScientificWriting and docs
Related

paper-review compared with skills from other repositories

paper-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
paper-reviewwoliveiras/geremmyasSkill103mo agoMITA36Claude Code, Codex
instrument-data-to-allotropeanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsSkill35k2d agoApache-2.0A123Claude Code
exploratory-data-analysisK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsSkill56k4d agoMITA83Claude Code
matlabK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsSkill56k4d agoMITA44Claude Code
phylogeneticsK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsSkill56k4d agoMITA71Claude Code, Codex
research-engineerdavila7/claude-code-templatesSkill33kyesterdayMITA43Claude Code, Codex
mapping-to-snomedmaziyarpanahi/openmedSkill5.8kyesterdayApache-2.0A205Claude Code