Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add YuanyuanMa03/academic-research-skills --skill nature-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/YuanyuanMa03/academic-research-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuanyuanma03/academic-research-skills/nature-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuanyuanma03/academic-research-skills/nature-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yuanyuanma03/academic-research-skills/nature-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yuanyuanma03/academic-research-skills/nature-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yuanyuanma03/academic-research-skills/nature-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.01437 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00575 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00287 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00144 |
Grade A, and why
nature-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to nature-writing — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Nature-Style Scientific Writing
Use this skill when the user needs help creating or rebuilding manuscript prose, not merely polishing existing sentences.
Core stance
- Author evidence comes first. Do not invent results, mechanisms, references, methods, novelty, sample sizes, statistics or limitations.
- Write the argument before writing the sentences.
- Make the paper easy to judge: relevance, novelty, trust, reuse and meaning.
- Use ambitious but bounded claims.
- If essential evidence is missing, write a placeholder or ask for the missing input instead of filling the gap.
When to open extra files
| File | Open when |
|---|---|
| references/article-architecture.md | You need section-level structure, argument order, or published-article writing patterns |
| references/abstract.md | Drafting or revising an abstract, especially challenge-contribution and challenge-insight-contribution forms |
| references/introduction.md | Drafting or revising an Introduction, task framing, technical challenge, contribution framing, or teaser/pipeline logic |
| references/related-work.md | Rebuilding Related Work as topic synthesis instead of a paper-by-paper list |
| references/method.md | Writing Method sections, pipeline modules, module motivation, technical advantages, or implementation details |
| references/experiments.md | Planning or writing Experiments/Results around baselines, ablations, metrics, tables, figures, and claim support |
| references/conclusion.md | Writing a bounded conclusion with contribution, evidence, impact, limitation, and future direction |
| references/paragraph-flow.md | User asks whether a paragraph flows, makes sense, or is clear; use reverse outlining and paragraph-message checks |
| references/paper-review.md | Final manuscript self-review, rejection-risk audit, claim-evidence alignment, or reviewer-facing critique |
| references/chinese-author-workflow.md | The user's notes are Chinese, mixed Chinese-English, or organized as lab notes rather than manuscript prose |
| references/examples/index.md | You need concrete abstract, introduction, or method examples after choosing the relevant guide |
What ships with it
60 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 270 B
- manifest.yaml 4.6 KB
- README.md 2.1 KB
- references/abstract.md 3.5 KB
- references/article-architecture.md 3.1 KB
- references/chinese-author-workflow.md 1.8 KB
- references/conclusion.md 1.2 KB
- references/examples/abstract-examples.md 875 B
- references/examples/abstract/template-a.md 950 B
- references/examples/abstract/template-b.md 3.2 KB
- references/examples/abstract/template-c.md 1.7 KB
- references/examples/index.md 2.3 KB
- references/examples/introduction-examples.md 1.5 KB
- references/examples/introduction/novel-task-challenge-decomposition.md 1.5 KB
- references/examples/introduction/pipeline-not-recommended-abstract-only.md 2.9 KB
- references/examples/introduction/pipeline-version-1-one-contribution-multi-advantages.md 2.0 KB
- references/examples/introduction/pipeline-version-2-two-contributions.md 2.0 KB
- references/examples/introduction/pipeline-version-3-new-module-on-existing-pipeline.md 1.5 KB
- references/examples/introduction/pipeline-version-4-observation-driven.md 1.4 KB
- references/examples/introduction/technical-challenge-version-1-existing-task.md 2.6 KB
- references/examples/introduction/technical-challenge-version-2-existing-task-insight-backed-by-traditional.md 3.8 KB
- references/examples/introduction/technical-challenge-version-3-novel-task.md 1.6 KB
- references/examples/introduction/version-1-task-then-application.md 727 B
- references/examples/introduction/version-2-application-first.md 405 B
- references/examples/introduction/version-3-general-to-specific-setting.md 847 B
- references/examples/introduction/version-4-open-with-challenge.md 1.7 KB
- references/examples/method-examples.md 1.0 KB
- references/examples/method/example-of-the-three-elements.md 7.3 KB
- references/examples/method/method-writing-common-issues-note.md 355 B
- references/examples/method/module-design-instant-ngp.md 4.5 KB
- references/examples/method/module-motivation-patterns.md 410 B
- references/examples/method/module-triad-neural-body.md 763 B
- references/examples/method/neural-body-annotated-figure-text.md 2.8 KB
- references/examples/method/overview-template.md 2.0 KB
- references/examples/method/pre-writing-questions.md 479 B
- references/examples/method/section-skeleton.md 110 B
- references/experiments.md 4.4 KB
- references/introduction.md 15 KB
- references/method.md 6.1 KB
- references/nat-comms-2025-corpus.md 7.3 KB
- references/nature-summary-paragraph.md 9.8 KB
- references/paper-review.md 5.3 KB
- references/paragraph-flow.md 1.7 KB
- references/related-work.md 1.3 KB
- static/core/output-format.md 1.0 KB
- static/core/stance.md 2.2 KB
- static/core/workflow.md 5.8 KB
- static/fragments/journal/generic.md 876 B
- static/fragments/journal/nat-comms.md 2.9 KB
- static/fragments/journal/nature.md 1.9 KB
- static/fragments/language/en.md 1.0 KB
- static/fragments/language/zh-to-en.md 1.6 KB
- static/fragments/paper_type/algorithmic.md 1.2 KB
- static/fragments/paper_type/hypothesis.md 1.0 KB
- static/fragments/paper_type/methods.md 1.2 KB
- static/fragments/paper_type/research.md 1.3 KB
- static/fragments/paper_type/review.md 1.2 KB
- static/fragments/section/abstract.md 1.3 KB
- static/fragments/section/conclusion.md 929 B
- static/fragments/section/discussion.md 1.1 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 161 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 66257f887828
nature-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository YuanyuanMa03/academic-research-skills (75 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,437 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to nature-writing, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper2poster-poster
Use when the user wants to turn an academic paper into a conference poster, poster outline, poster copy deck, poster layout brief, poster.yaml style draft, or Paper2Poster-ready generation package. Trigger for paper-to-poster requests involving PDF papers, arXiv links, manuscripts, PPTX posters, conference…
manuscript-optimizer
Use when auditing, restructuring, or revising a research manuscript whose scientific question, claim hierarchy, evidence chain, section logic, figures, terminology, or prose may be unclear or out of sync. Apply before sentence-level polishing, especially for whole drafts, major revisions, resubmissions, overclaiming…
review-article-architecture
Use when writing, restructuring, or auditing a Review, survey, or Perspective rather than a research article, especially a commissioned one written across many sessions. Covers the governing plan document, drift detection, single-definition thesis and field judgements, section-owns-figure allocation, display-item…
write-scientific-manuscript
Diagnose and repair the clarity and logic of manuscript prose, journal-agnostic. Use when a passage is technically correct but hard to follow: buried topic sentences, missing logical bridges, ambiguous referents, abstract noun chains, overloaded sentences, incomplete comparisons with no stated dataset or metric or…
paper-reviewer
Referee-side skill for Nature Portfolio manuscripts: write a referee report, inventory every ask and sub-ask in received comments, grade drafted replies, and test reply readability. Check methodology, statistics, reporting, reproducibility and data/code availability. Preserve referee wording, numbering and order…
figure-planner
Use when designing, restructuring, or auditing manuscript figures and you need to define one main claim per figure, assign panel roles, align legends with the text, or decide what belongs in main figures versus supplement.