Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ZimoLiao/scholaraio. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ZimoLiao/scholaraio/main/.claude/skills/audit/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZimoLiao/scholaraioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zimoliao/scholaraio/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zimoliao/scholaraio/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zimoliao/scholaraio/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zimoliao/scholaraio/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zimoliao/scholaraio/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00733 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00293 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
论文审计
检查已入库论文的数据质量。分阶段:规则化检查(自动)+ LLM 深度诊断(对可疑项)+ 自动修复。
阶段一:规则化检查
scholaraio audit [--severity error|warning|info]
问题按严重程度分类:
- 错误:缺少标题、缺少 MD 文件、JSON 解析失败、DOI 重复
- 警告:缺少 DOI/摘要/年份/作者/期刊、MD 过短、标题不一致、文件名年份不匹配
- 提示:文件名不符合规范格式
阶段二:LLM 深度诊断(title_mismatch 专项)
对每篇 title_mismatch 论文,用 Read 工具读取 meta.json 和 paper.md(前 80 行),提取最像标题的候选(不只看首个 H1),判断:
- MD 正文的实际主题/标题是否与 JSON 元数据一致
- 无害(封面/前言页、MinerU 标题识别问题)vs 真正的内容错配
阶段三:修复
对确认的错配,使用 repair 命令:
# 先 dry-run 预览
scholaraio repair "<paper-id>" --title "正确标题" [--author "一作"] [--year YYYY] [--doi "10.xxx/..."] --dry-run
# 确认后执行
scholaraio repair "<paper-id>" --title "正确标题" [--author "一作"] [--year YYYY] [--doi "10.xxx/..."] [--no-api]
# 修复后重建索引
scholaraio pipeline reindex
检查规则
| 规则 | 级别 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|
missing_title |
error | 缺少标题 |
missing_md |
error | JSON 无对应 MD 文件 |
duplicate_doi |
error | DOI 重复 |
missing_doi |
warning | 缺少 DOI(document / patent 等非论文类型通常不报) |
missing_abstract |
warning | 缺少摘要 |
title_mismatch |
warning | JSON 标题与 MD 前 80 行里的标题候选不一致 |
nonstandard_filename |
info | 文件名不符合规范格式 |
补充判断口径:
paper_type为空时,仍按普通论文保守检查missing_doi/missing_journaldissertation、document、technical-report、lecture-notes等非 article 类型,优先警惕封面/前言页导致的title_mismatch误报
示例
用户说:"帮我检查一下论文库有没有问题" → 执行阶段一规则化检查
用户说:"深度检查" → 执行阶段一 + 阶段二(LLM 逐篇诊断 title_mismatch)
用户说:"修复那些错配的论文" → 执行阶段三
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 809d2d935a8c
audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZimoLiao/scholaraio (584 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 733 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
audit compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| auditZimoLiao/scholaraio | Skill | 584 | 10d ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| thoughtdagchenxiachan/thoughtdag | Skill | 742 | 5d ago | MIT | B | 39 | Claude Code, Codex |
| autosearch:channel-selection0xmariowu/Autosearch | Skill | 54 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 87 | Claude Code |
| autosearch:context-retention-policy0xmariowu/Autosearch | Skill | 54 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 89 | Claude Code |
| autosearch:delegate-subtask0xmariowu/Autosearch | Skill | 54 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code |
| autosearch:experience-compact0xmariowu/Autosearch | Skill | 54 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 69 | Claude Code |
| autosearch:graph-search-plan0xmariowu/Autosearch | Skill | 54 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 72 | Claude Code |