Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to blockscout/frontend. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/blockscout/frontend/main/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/blockscout/frontendWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/blockscout/frontend/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/blockscout/frontend/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/blockscout/frontend/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00266 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00133 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 21 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 18a648f33516
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository blockscout/frontend (304 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 266 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
assembly-auditor
Specialist for inline assembly / Yul. Reviews memory layout, return-data handling, dirty-bits, opcode usage. Use whenever significant assembly is present.
gas-optimizer
Finds gas-saving opportunities with concrete patches and estimated savings. Use from /gas.
security-reviewer
Review Solidity contracts for security vulnerabilities, incentive design, and OpenZeppelin best practices.
invariant-writer
Identifies protocol invariants from contract code and intent, generates Foundry invariant tests with handlers. Use from /invariant and /audit-deep.
attacker
Adversarial reviewer. Reads contract code with one goal — find a way to steal, brick, or grief. Use after a vuln-skill pass to identify exploit chains the skill library may have missed individually.
exploit-poc-writer
Writes Foundry test files that prove an exploit. The test MUST compile and pass. Use from /exploit, /exploit-chain, /exploit-live.